Summary of Study ST002109

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001336. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M81D70 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST002109
Study TitleTowards a mechanistic understanding of patient response to neoadjuvant SBRT with anti-PDL1 in human HPV-unrelated locally advanced HNSCC: Phase I/Ib trial results (Part 1)
Study SummaryFive-year survival for HPV-unrelated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) remains below 50%. We assessed the safety of administering combination hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with anti-PDL-1 neoadjuvantly followed by adjuvant anti-PDL-1 with standard of care therapy (n=21). The primary endpoint of the study was safety, which was met. Secondary endpoints included radiographic, pathologic, and objective response, locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Among evaluable patients at early median follow-up of 16 months (448 days), OS was 83.3%, LRC and PFS were 83.3%, and major pathological response (MPR) or complete response (CR) was 75%. Circulating CD8/Treg ratio, CD4 effector memory T cells, and TCR repertoire emerged as biologic correlates of response to therapy. Using high-dimensional multi-omics and spatial data as well as biological correlatives pre- and post-treatment, three major changes were noted in responders within the tumor microenvironment (TME) (and within the blood) post-treatment: 1) an increase in effector T cells; 2) a decrease in immunosuppressive cells; and 3) an increase in antigen presentation. Non-responders appeared to fail due to a lack of one of these three identified steps needed for priming and maintaining activation of T cells. Multiple correlates for response, along with subsets of non-responders that may benefit from additional or alternative immunotherapies, were identified. This treatment is being tested in an ongoing phase II trial with a similar design, where we hope to confirm and expand on our understanding of the mechanisms underlying resistance to therapy.
Institute
University of Colorado Denver
Last NameCulp-Hill
First NameRachel
Address12801 E 17th Ave L18-9403D, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, USA
Emailrachel.hill@cuanschutz.edu
Phone303-724-5798
Submit Date2022-03-09
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzXML
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2022-04-04
Release Version1
Rachel Culp-Hill Rachel Culp-Hill
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M81D70
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR001336
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M81D70
Project Title:Towards a mechanistic understanding of patient response to neoadjuvant SBRT with anti-PDL1 in human HPV-unrelated locally advanced HNSCC: Phase I/Ib trial results
Project Summary:Five-year survival for HPV-unrelated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) remains below 50%. We assessed the safety of administering combination hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with anti-PDL-1 neoadjuvantly followed by adjuvant anti-PDL-1 with standard of care therapy (n=21). The primary endpoint of the study was safety, which was met. Secondary endpoints included radiographic, pathologic, and objective response, locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Among evaluable patients at early median follow-up of 16 months (448 days), OS was 83.3%, LRC and PFS were 83.3%, and major pathological response (MPR) or complete response (CR) was 75%. Circulating CD8/Treg ratio, CD4 effector memory T cells, and TCR repertoire emerged as biologic correlates of response to therapy. Using high-dimensional multi-omics and spatial data as well as biological correlatives pre- and post-treatment, three major changes were noted in responders within the tumor microenvironment (TME) (and within the blood) post-treatment: 1) an increase in effector T cells; 2) a decrease in immunosuppressive cells; and 3) an increase in antigen presentation. Non-responders appeared to fail due to a lack of one of these three identified steps needed for priming and maintaining activation of T cells. Multiple correlates for response, along with subsets of non-responders that may benefit from additional or alternative immunotherapies, were identified. This treatment is being tested in an ongoing phase II trial with a similar design, where we hope to confirm and expand on our understanding of the mechanisms underlying resistance to therapy.
Institute:University of Colorado Denver
Last Name:Culp-Hill
First Name:Rachel
Address:12801 E 17th Ave L18-9403D, Aurora, Colorado, 80045, USA
Email:rachel.hill@cuanschutz.edu
Phone:303-724-5798

Subject:

Subject ID:SU002194
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606

Factors:

Subject type: Human; Subject species: Homo sapiens (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Phenotype Treatment
SA202361BW45-39NA Post
SA202362BW45-40NA Post
SA202363BW45-38NA Post
SA202364BW45-41NA Pre
SA202365BW45-37NA Pre
SA202366BW45-36NA Pre
SA202393BW45-1non-responder Post
SA202394BW45-5non-responder Post
SA202395BW45-29non-responder Post
SA202396BW45-7non-responder Post
SA202397BW45-25non-responder Post
SA202398BW45-4non-responder Pre
SA202399BW45-6non-responder Pre
SA202400BW45-28non-responder Pre
SA202401BW45-24non-responder Pre
SA202367BW45-13Responder Post
SA202368BW45-15Responder Post
SA202369BW45-11Responder Post
SA202370BW45-17Responder Post
SA202371BW45-3Responder Post
SA202372BW45-9Responder Post
SA202373BW45-23Responder Post
SA202374BW45-33Responder Post
SA202375BW45-35Responder Post
SA202376BW45-19Responder Post
SA202377BW45-31Responder Post
SA202378BW45-27Responder Post
SA202379BW45-21Responder Post
SA202380BW45-30Responder Pre
SA202381BW45-32Responder Pre
SA202382BW45-34Responder Pre
SA202383BW45-26Responder Pre
SA202384BW45-16Responder Pre
SA202385BW45-8Responder Pre
SA202386BW45-2Responder Pre
SA202387BW45-22Responder Pre
SA202388BW45-10Responder Pre
SA202389BW45-12Responder Pre
SA202390BW45-20Responder Pre
SA202391BW45-18Responder Pre
SA202392BW45-14Responder Pre
Showing results 1 to 41 of 41

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002187
Collection Summary:This was a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase I/Ib safety trial. Patients eligible for treatment had to be diagnosed with non-metastatic, biopsy-proven p16-negative histology squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx, and had to be eligible and amenable to surgical resection. This study enrolled using a 3+3 model. Patients received one dose of neoadjuvant Durvalumab 1500 mg approximately 3-6 weeks before standard-of-care surgery given concurrently with the first dose of radiation (RT). The starting RT dose level was 6 Gy for 2 fractions (12 Gy total) every other day over approximately one week to sites of gross disease (Table 1) to minimize exposure to normal tissue. If toxicity developed and surgery was delayed by more than 6 weeks due to treatment toxicity (qualifying as a DLT), the radiation dose was set to be dropped per protocol for the next set of patients. If this dose was tolerated, the dose was increased to 6 Gy for 3 fractions (18 Gy total) for the next 3 patients. Patients proceeded to surgical resection approximately 3-6 weeks after radiation as recommended by the ENT surgeon. Post-operatively, pathology was reviewed at the multi-disciplinary head and neck conference, and the need for adjuvant therapy was discussed. For the first 8 patients, all patients were given adjuvant therapy based on presenting features. However, after patient 8, adjuvant therapy was dictated based on high-risk pathologic features as per the NCCN guidelines and treating physician recommendations. Adjuvant radiation included intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 60 Gy in 2 Gy once-daily fraction size once-daily fraction size (total of 30 fractions). If indicated, adjuvant systemic therapy included cisplatin or other cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted biologics (Cetuximab) per physician discretion. All patients received adjuvant durvalumab to be initiated approximately 6-12 weeks post-surgery. It was given as 1500 mg intravenously once every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 doses, or until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal from study. This was delivered either as monotherapy or concurrently with adjuvant radiation +/- systemic therapy for high-risk patients. Safety and toxicity evaluations were done throughout the study process. DLTs and adjustment of radiation doses were done during the neoadjuvant period.
Sample Type:Blood (plasma)

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002206
Treatment Summary:This was a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase I/Ib safety trial. Patients eligible for treatment had to be diagnosed with non-metastatic, biopsy-proven p16-negative histology squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx, and had to be eligible and amenable to surgical resection. This study enrolled using a 3+3 model. Patients received one dose of neoadjuvant Durvalumab 1500 mg approximately 3-6 weeks before standard-of-care surgery given concurrently with the first dose of radiation (RT). The starting RT dose level was 6 Gy for 2 fractions (12 Gy total) every other day over approximately one week to sites of gross disease (Table 1) to minimize exposure to normal tissue. If toxicity developed and surgery was delayed by more than 6 weeks due to treatment toxicity (qualifying as a DLT), the radiation dose was set to be dropped per protocol for the next set of patients. If this dose was tolerated, the dose was increased to 6 Gy for 3 fractions (18 Gy total) for the next 3 patients. Patients proceeded to surgical resection approximately 3-6 weeks after radiation as recommended by the ENT surgeon. Post-operatively, pathology was reviewed at the multi-disciplinary head and neck conference, and the need for adjuvant therapy was discussed. For the first 8 patients, all patients were given adjuvant therapy based on presenting features. However, after patient 8, adjuvant therapy was dictated based on high-risk pathologic features as per the NCCN guidelines and treating physician recommendations. Adjuvant radiation included intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 60 Gy in 2 Gy once-daily fraction size once-daily fraction size (total of 30 fractions). If indicated, adjuvant systemic therapy included cisplatin or other cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted biologics (Cetuximab) per physician discretion. All patients received adjuvant durvalumab to be initiated approximately 6-12 weeks post-surgery. It was given as 1500 mg intravenously once every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 doses, or until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal from study. This was delivered either as monotherapy or concurrently with adjuvant radiation +/- systemic therapy for high-risk patients. Safety and toxicity evaluations were done throughout the study process. DLTs and adjustment of radiation doses were done during the neoadjuvant period.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002200
Sampleprep Summary:Metabolomics analyses were performed as extensively described in previous studies (Issaian et al., Hematologica 2021). A volume of 20μl of frozen plasma was extracted in either 480μl of methanol:acetonitrile:water (5:3:2, v/v/v) (D'Alessandro et al. JCI Insight 2021). After vortexing at 4°C for 30 min, extracts were separated from the protein pellet by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000g at 4°C and stored at −80°C until analysis. Ultra-High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry analyses were performed using a Vanquish UHPLC coupled online to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Bremen, Germany) (Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019). Samples were analyzed using a 5-minute gradient as described ( Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019, Nemkov et al. JCI Insight 2020). Solvents were supplemented with 0.1% formic acid for positive mode runs and 1 mM ammonium acetate for negative mode runs. MS acquisition, data analysis and elaboration were performed as described.

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003450 AN003451
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Vanquish Thermo Vanquish
Column Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um) Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Ion Mode NEGATIVE POSITIVE
Units Relative Abundance Relative Abundance

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002548
Chromatography Summary:Negative Mode: Samples were analyzed using a 5-minute gradient as described (Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019, Nemkov et al. JCI Insight 2020). Solvents were supplemented with 1 mM ammonium acetate for negative mode runs.
Instrument Name:Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase
  
Chromatography ID:CH002549
Chromatography Summary:Positive Mode: Samples were analyzed using a 5-minute gradient as described (Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019, Nemkov et al. JCI Insight 2020). Solvents were supplemented with 0.1% formic acid for positive mode runs.
Instrument Name:Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS003213
Analysis ID:AN003450
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:MS acquisition, data analysis and elaboration were performed as described. (Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019).
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  
MS ID:MS003214
Analysis ID:AN003451
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:MS acquisition, data analysis and elaboration were performed as described. (Nemkov et al. Methods Mol Bio 2019).
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  logo