#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH Codreags00_20230929_134531 DATATRACK_ID:4349 STUDY_ID:ST002891 ANALYSIS_ID:AN004750 PROJECT_ID:PR001804
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	October 2, 2023, 8:16 am
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Glutamine metabolism improves left ventricular function but not
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	macrophage-mediated inflammation following myocardial infarction
PR:PROJECT_TYPE                  	Untargeted Metabolomics analysis
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Glutamine is a critical amino acid that serves as an energy source, building
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	block, and signaling molecule for both the heart tissue and the immune system.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	However, the role of glutamine metabolism in regulating cardiac remodeling
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	following myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. In this study, we show that
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	glutamine metabolism is altered both in the remote (contractile) area and in
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	infiltrating macrophages in the infarct area after MI in adult male mice by
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	permanent left anterior descending artery occlusion. Using untargeted
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	metabolomics in extracted LV macrophages, we found that metabolites related to
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	glutamine metabolism were differentially altered at days 1, 3, and 7 after MI.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Glutamine metabolism in live cells was found to be increased after MI relative
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	to no MI controls. Gene expression in the remote area of the heart indicated a
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	loss of glutamine metabolism. Glutamine administration improved LV function at
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	days 1, 3, and 7, which was associated with improved contractile and metabolic
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	gene expression.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Vanderbilt University
PR:DEPARTMENT                    	Chemistry
PR:LABORATORY                    	Center for Innovative Technology
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Codreanu
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Simona
PR:ADDRESS                       	1234 STEVENSON CENTER LANE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37235, USA
PR:EMAIL                         	SIMONA.CODREANU@VANDERBILT.EDU
PR:PHONE                         	6158758422
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Glutamine metabolism improves left ventricular function but not
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	macrophage-mediated inflammation following myocardial infarction
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Glutamine is a critical amino acid that serves as an energy source, building
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	block, and signaling molecule for both the heart tissue and the immune system.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	However, the role of glutamine metabolism in regulating cardiac remodeling
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	following myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. In this study, we show that
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	glutamine metabolism is altered both in the remote (contractile) area and in
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	infiltrating macrophages in the infarct area after MI in adult male mice by
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	permanent left anterior descending artery occlusion. Using untargeted
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	metabolomics in extracted LV macrophages, we found that metabolites related to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	glutamine metabolism were differentially altered at days 1, 3, and 7 after MI.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Glutamine metabolism in live cells was found to be increased after MI relative
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	to no MI controls. Gene expression in the remote area of the heart indicated a
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	loss of glutamine metabolism. Glutamine administration improved LV function at
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	days 1, 3, and 7, which was associated with improved contractile and metabolic
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	gene expression.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Vanderbilt University
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Chemistry
ST:LABORATORY                    	Center for Innovative Technology
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Codreanu
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Simona
ST:ADDRESS                       	1234 STEVENSON CENTER LANE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37235, USA
ST:EMAIL                         	SIMONA.CODREANU@VANDERBILT.EDU
ST:STUDY_TYPE                    	untargeted metabolomics analysis
ST:PHONE                         	6158758422
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Mammal
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Mus musculus
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	10090
SU:AGE_OR_AGE_RANGE              	15-20 week old
SU:GENDER                        	Male
SU:SPECIES_GROUP                 	C57BL/6J
#FACTORS
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_1	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_2	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_3	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_4	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_5	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D1_6	Gln Treatment:Day 1	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D1_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_1	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_2	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_3	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_4	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_5	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_5
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D3_6	Gln Treatment:Day 3	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D3_6
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D7_1	Gln Treatment:Day 7	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D7_1
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D7_2	Gln Treatment:Day 7	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D7_2
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D7_3	Gln Treatment:Day 7	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D7_3
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D7_4	Gln Treatment:Day 7	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D7_4
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	D7_5	Gln Treatment:Day 7	RAW_FILE_NAME=SC_20211103_HILICn_FMS_Mouton_D7_5
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	MI was induced in adult (15-20 week old) male C57BL/6J mice as previously
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	described.2,4,6 Mice were anesthetized (2% isoflurane) and laid supine on a
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	heated stage (37°C), intubated and connected to a mouse ventilator (Harvard
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Apparatus; 300µL stroke volume, 300 breaths/min). The chest was incised to
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	expose the ribs, and the heart exposed between the 3rd and 4th ribs. The
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	pericardial layer was gently removed, and the left coronary artery was ligated
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	~1mm below the left atrium using 8-0 suture. Ischemia was confirmed by blanching
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	of the LV. For glutamine administration, mice were injected intraperitoneally
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	with glutamine (0.75-1g/kg) or saline vehicle beginning at either day 1 post-MI
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	(for day 3 time-point) or beginning at day 3 (for day 7 time-point). A separate
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	cohort of mice was injected 2 hr after MI and studied 24 hr later (day 1). To
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	inhibit glutamine metabolism, mice were administered BPTES (12.5mg/kg; 10% in
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	DMSO/corn oil), a glutaminase-1 inhibitor, beginning at either day 1 or day 3.
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Macrophages
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	For glutamine administration, mice were injected intraperitoneally with
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	glutamine (0.75-1g/kg) or saline vehicle beginning at either day 1 post-MI (for
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	day 3 time-point) or beginning at day 3 (for day 7 time-point). A separate
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	cohort of mice was injected 2 hr after MI and studied 24 hr later (day 1). To
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	inhibit glutamine metabolism, mice were administered BPTES (12.5mg/kg; 10% in
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	DMSO/corn oil), a glutaminase-1 inhibitor, beginning at either day 1 or day 3.
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Frozen samples were stored at -80°C until analyzed by LC-MS-based metabolomics
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	in the Vanderbilt Center for Innovative Technology (CIT). Isotopically labeled
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	phenylalanine-D8 and biotin-D2 were added to 200 μL of culture supernatant per
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	sample, and protein was precipitated by addition of 800 μL of ice-cold methanol
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	followed by overnight incubation at −80°C. Precipitated proteins were
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	pelleted by centrifugation (15,000 rpm, 15 min), and extracted metabolites
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	were dried down in vacuo and stored at −80°C. Individual samples were
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	reconstituted in 100 μL of reconstitution buffer (acetonitrile/water, 90:10,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	vol/vol) containing tryptophan-D3 and inosine-4N15. Equal volumes of individual
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	samples were pooled to create a quality control (QC) pooled sample used for
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	column conditioning, retention time alignment, to assess instrument
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	reproducibility, and for batch acceptance.
SP:PROCESSING_STORAGE_CONDITIONS 	-80℃
SP:EXTRACT_STORAGE               	-80℃
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Metabolite extracts were separated on ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide HILIC 1.7 μm,
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	2.1 × 100 mm column (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) held at 30°C.
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Liquid chromatography was performed at a 200 μL min using solvent A (5 mM
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Ammonium formate in 90% water, 10% acetonitrile, and 0.1% formic acid) and
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	solvent B (5 mM Ammonium formate in 90% acetonitrile, 10% water, and 0.1%
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	formic acid) with a gradient length of 30 min.
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	HILIC
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Vanquish UHPLC
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide HILIC
CH:SOLVENT_A                     	90% water/10% acetonitrile; 5mM ammonium formate; 0.1% formic acid
CH:SOLVENT_B                     	10% water/90% acetonitrile; 5mM ammonium formate; 0.1% formic acid
CH:FLOW_GRADIENT                 	Linear gradient of 30 min
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	0.20mL/min
CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE            	30
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	Orbitrap
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	NEGATIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	The acquired raw data were imported, processed, normalized and reviewed using
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Progenesis QI v.3.0 (Non-linear Dynamics, Newcastle, UK). All MS and MS/MS
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	sample runs were aligned against a QC pool reference run, and unique ions
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(retention time and m/z pairs) were deadducted and deisotoped to generate unique
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	"features" (retention time and m/z pairs). Data were normalized to all features
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	using Progenesis QI. Experimental data annotations were assigned based on
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	consistent retention time and MS2 fragmentation pattern matches with reference
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	standards.
MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE               	ST002891_AN004750_Results.txt	UNITS:time_m/z	Has m/z:Yes	Has RT:Yes	RT units:Minutes
#END