#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH Cristina_20200425_024934 DATATRACK_ID:1993 STUDY_ID:ST001371 ANALYSIS_ID:AN002289 PROJECT_ID:PR000937
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	May 5, 2020, 12:52 pm
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Untargeted metabolomics of Quercus ilex acorns
PR:PROJECT_TYPE                  	LC-MSE analysis
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	UPLC-MSE analysis of samples from Quercus ilex acorns flour. The objective of
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	the study is to obtain a metabolomic profile of several acorns from different
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	trees. This phytochemical analysis and characterization will be a base for
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	identification of bioactive, antinutritional, or toxic compounds and
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	traceability analysis.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Universidad de Córdoba
PR:DEPARTMENT                    	Department Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
PR:LABORATORY                    	Agroforestry and Plant Biochemistry, Proteomics and Systems Biology
PR:LAST_NAME                     	López-Hidalgo
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Cristina
PR:ADDRESS                       	Campus de Rabanales; Edificio C6, Planta Baja
PR:EMAIL                         	n12lohic@uco.es
PR:PHONE                         	626894948
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	This work was supported by the University of Cordoba and financial support from
PR:FUNDING_SOURCE                	the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project BIO2015-64737-R2).
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	Phytochemical composition and variability among Quercus ilex acorns determined
PR:PUBLICATIONS                  	by NIRS and MS-based approaches
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Untargeted metabolomics of Quercus ilex acorns
ST:STUDY_TYPE                    	LC-MSE analysis
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	UPLC-MSE analysis of samples from Quercus ilex acorns flour. The objective of
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	the study is to obtain a metabolomic profile of several acorns from different
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	trees. This phytochemical analysis and characterization will be a base for the
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	identification of bioactive, antinutritional, or toxic compounds and
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	traceability analysis.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Universidad de Córdoba
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Department Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ST:LABORATORY                    	Agroforestry and Plant Biochemistry, Proteomics and Systems Biology
ST:LAST_NAME                     	López-Hidalgo
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Cristina
ST:ADDRESS                       	Campus de Rabanales; Edificio C6, Planta Baja
ST:EMAIL                         	n12lohic@uco.es
ST:PHONE                         	626894948
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Plant
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Quercus ilex
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	58334
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B F_POS C	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B F_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_POS C1	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_POS C1.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_POS C2	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_POS C2.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_POS C3	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_POS C3.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_POS C4	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_POS C4.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_POS C5	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_POS C5.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL1_POS C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL1_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL2_POS C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL2_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL3_POS C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL3_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BR_POS C	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=BR_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BR_POS C_1	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=BR_POS C_1.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD1_POS C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD1_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD2_POS C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD2_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD3_POS C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD3_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MIX FEN F_POS C	Mixture:Phenolics mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=MIX FEN F_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MIX FEN_POS C	Mixture:Phenolics mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=MIX FEN_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC1_POS C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC1_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC2_POS C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC2_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC3_POS C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC3_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL1_POS C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL1_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL2_POS C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL2_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL3_POS C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL3_POS C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_POS C01	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_POS C01.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_POS C02	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_POS C02.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_POS C03	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_POS C03.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_POS C04	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_POS C04.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B F_NEG C	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B F_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_NEG C1	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_NEG C1.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_NEG C2	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_NEG C2.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_NEG C3	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_NEG C3.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_NEG C4	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_NEG C4.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	B_NEG C5	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=B_NEG C5.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL1_NEG C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL1_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL2_NEG C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL2_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BOL3_NEG C	Mixture:BOL	RAW_FILE_NAME=BOL3_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BR_NEG C	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=BR_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	BR_NEG C_1	Mixture:Blank	RAW_FILE_NAME=BR_NEG C_1.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD1_NEG C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD1_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD2_NEG C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD2_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MAD3_NEG C	Mixture:MAD	RAW_FILE_NAME=MAD3_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MIX FEN F_NEG C	Mixture:Phenolics mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=MIX FEN F_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	MIX FEN_NEG C	Mixture:Phenolics mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=MIX FEN_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC1_NEG C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC1_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC2_NEG C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC2_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	NTC3_NEG C	Mixture:NTC	RAW_FILE_NAME=NTC3_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL1_NEG C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL1_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL2_NEG C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL2_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	POL3_NEG C	Mixture:POL	RAW_FILE_NAME=POL3_NEG C.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_NEG C01	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_NEG C01.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_NEG C02	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_NEG C02.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_NEG C03	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_NEG C03.mzXML
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	QC MIX2_NEG C04	Mixture:Quality Control mixture	RAW_FILE_NAME=QC MIX2_NEG C04.mzXML
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Sample collection: Mature acorns from holm oak (Quercus ilex L. subsp.ballota
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	[Desf.] Samp.) were collected from four different trees located in Aldea de
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Cuenca (province of Cordoba, Andalusia, Spain). All acorns were picked at the
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	optimal harvest maturity window on the same day. Sorting, disinfection, and
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	storage of healthy acorns were conducted according to Bonner & Vozzo, (1987).
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Acorn flour preparation: Healthy acorns (20 units per tree) were scarified with
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	a knife by making transversal and longitudinal cuts, thus permitting the
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	pericarp to be rapidly removed. Flour was prepared by seed (without seed coat)
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	grinding with liquid nitrogen in a blade mill (IKA Dry Mill Basic A10) until a
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	powder was obtained (Valero Galván, Jorrín Novo, Cabrera, et al., 2012). Flour
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	was lyophilized and then macerated in a mortar until a fine powder was obtained.
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Samples were stored at 4 ºC in within a desiccator, in darkness, until NIRS
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	analysis or metabolite extraction.
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Acorns
CO:STORAGE_CONDITIONS            	Room temperature
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	Mature acorns from holm oak (Quercus ilex L. subsp.ballota [Desf.] Samp.) were
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	collected from nine different trees. From these, four were selected for
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	metabolomic analysis (POL, BOL, NTC, and MAD).
TR:PLANT_GROWTH_LOCATION         	Aldea de Cuenca (province of Cordoba, Andalusia, Spain)
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Metabolites were extracted from acorn flour as described by Valledor et al.,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	(2014), with minor modifications. 600 µL of ice-cold methanol: chloroform:
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	water (5:2:2) was added to 50 mg of acorn flour, mixed by vortexing, and the
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	mixture sonicated (ultrasonic bath, 40 kHZ for 10 min). After centrifugation (4
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	oC, 4 min, 20,000 × g), the pellet was once more extracted with 200 µL of cold
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	methanol: chloroform: water (5:2:2). The two supernatants were combined and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	vacuum dried at 30 oC (Speedvac, Eppendorf Vacuum Concentrator Plus/5301). Dried
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	extracts were reconstituted in methanol, centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 10 min,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	filtered through 0.22 µm PTPE membranes (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	filtrate collected in 1.5 mL LC/MS certified sample vials.
SP:PROCESSING_STORAGE_CONDITIONS 	Room temperature
SP:EXTRACT_STORAGE               	On ice
SP:SAMPLE_RESUSPENSION           	Methanol
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	MS analysis was conducted in an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Acquity H-Class, Waters, Milford, USA) coupled to a quadrupole time of flight
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	(QTof) G2-XS mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, USA). The chromatographic
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	separation was carried out in a C18 column (2.1×100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters,
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	Milford, USA), kept at 45 °C. The injection volume was 5 µL, and the flow rate
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	set at 0.450 mL min−1. Mobile phases consisted of 0.1 % formic acid in Milli-Q
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	water (A) and methanol (B). The gradient elution profile was as follow (time, %
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	B): 0 min, 2% B; 0.25 min, 2 % B; 12.25 min, 99 % B; 13.0 min, 99 % B; 13.01
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	min; 2 % B; 17.00 min; 2 % B and then the column was equilibrated for 5 min
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_SUMMARY        	prior to each analysis.
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	Reversed phase
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Waters Acquity H-Class
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	C18 column (2.1×100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters, Milford, USA)
CH:FLOW_RATE                     	0.450 mL min−1
CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE            	45
CH:SOLVENT_A                     	0.1 % formic acid in Milli-Q water
CH:SOLVENT_B                     	0.1 % formic acid in methanol
CH:SAMPLE_INJECTION              	5
CH:ANALYTICAL_TIME               	17 min
CH:TIME_PROGRAM                  	17 min
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
AN:LABORATORY_NAME               	Agroforestry and Plant Biochemistry, Proteomics and Systems Biology
AN:DETECTOR_TYPE                 	QTOF
AN:DATA_FORMAT                   	.raw and .mzXML
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Waters Synapt G2 XS QTOF
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	QTOF
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	NEGATIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	MS analysis was conducted in an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Acquity H-Class, Waters, Milford, USA) coupled to a quadrupole time of flight
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(QTof) G2-XS mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, USA). The chromatographic
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	separation was carried out in a C18 column (2.1×100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Milford, USA), kept at 45 °C. The injection volume was 5 µL, and the flow rate
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	set at 0.450 mL min−1. Mobile phases consisted of 0.1 % formic acid in Milli-Q
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	water (A) and methanol (B). The gradient elution profile was as follow (time, %
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	B): 0 min, 2% B; 0.25 min, 2 % B; 12.25 min, 99 % B; 13.0 min, 99 % B; 13.01
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	min; 2 % B; 17.00 min; 2 % B and then the column was equilibrated for 5 min
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	prior to each analysis. The MS acquisition was performed in negative and
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	positive ionization modes in a scan range from m/z 100 to 1200 and time
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	acquisition of 0 to 17 min. The analysis type performed was accurate mass
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	screening on MSE data with a low collision energy of 4.00 eV and a high-energy
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	ramp of 10.00 to 45.00 eV. The capillary and cone voltage were set at 2.50 kV
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	and 40 V, respectively. The desolvation gas was set to 600 L h−1, the cone gas
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	set to 50 L h−1 and the source and desolvation temperature was set to 100 °C
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	and 250 °C, respectively. For automated accurate mass measurement, a solution
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	of leucine-enkephalin (200 ng mL−1) in methanol: water (50:50) with 0.1%
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	formic acid was used as lock mass and pumped at a flow rate of 5 µL min−1.
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	The molecule of leucine-enkephalin (m/z 556.2766 in ESI+ and m/z 554.262 in
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	ESI−) was used for recalibrating the mass axis and ensuring a robust accurate
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	mass measurement at any time. For continuous quality assurance and to provide
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	confidence in the data, quality control (QC), a mix prepared from equal volumes
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	of all the samples was injected between every three samples in the batch along
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	with methanol as a blank run to correct a drift of the raw signal intensity
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	during the analysis. All the data acquired were exported by Waters UNIFI
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	software in order to analyze by the software Progenesis QI (Nonlinear Dynamics,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	Newcastle, United Kingdom).
MS:COLLISION_ENERGY              	4.00 eV
MS:FRAGMENT_VOLTAGE              	High-ernergy ramp of 10.00 to 45.00 eV
MS:FRAGMENTATION_METHOD          	MSE
MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE               	ST001371_AN002289_Results.txt	UNITS:abundance	Has m/z:Yes	Has RT:Yes	RT units:Minutes
#END