#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH shawn_christensen_20200803_201125 DATATRACK_ID:2110 STUDY_ID:ST001489 ANALYSIS_ID:AN002467 PROJECT_ID:PR001006
VERSION             	1
CREATED_ON             	September 22, 2020, 10:04 am
#PROJECT
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	Metabolomics by UHPLC-HRMS reveals the impact of heat stress on
PR:PROJECT_TITLE                 	pathogen-elicited immunity in maize
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Studies investigating crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stress have largely
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	focused on plant responses to singular forms of stress and individual
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	biochemical pathways that only partially represent stress responses. Thus,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	combined biotic and abiotic stress treatments and the global assessment of their
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	elicited metabolic expression remains largely unexplored. In this study, we
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	employed targeted and untargeted metabolomics to investigate the metabolic
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	responses of maize (Zea mays) to both individual and combinatorial stress
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	treatments using heat (abiotic) and Cochliobolus heterostrophus infection
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	(biotic) experiments. Ultra-high-performance liquid
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry revealed significant metabolic
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	responses to C. heterostrophus infection and heat stress, and comparative
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	analyses between these individual forms of stress demonstrated differential
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	elicitation between the two global metabolomes. In combinatorial experiments,
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	treatment with heat stress prior to fungal inoculation negatively impacted maize
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	disease resistance against C. heterostrophus, and distinct metabolome separation
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	between combinatorial stressed plants and the non-heat stressed infected
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	controls was observed. Targeted analysis revealed inducible primary and
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	secondary metabolite responses to biotic/abiotic stress, and combinatorial
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	experiments indicated that deficiency in the hydroxycinnamic acid, p-coumaric
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	acid, may lead to the heat-induced susceptibility of maize to C. heterostrophus.
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	Collectively, these findings demonstrate that abiotic stress can predispose
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	crops to more severe disease symptoms, underlining the increasing need to
PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY               	investigate defense chemistry in plants under combinatorial stress.
PR:INSTITUTE                     	Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture
PR:LAST_NAME                     	Christensen
PR:FIRST_NAME                    	Shawn
PR:ADDRESS                       	1600 SW 23rd Drive Gainesville, FL 32608, Gainesville, Florida, 32607, USA
PR:EMAIL                         	shawn.christensen@usda.gov
PR:PHONE                         	3523745739
#STUDY
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	Metabolomics by UHPLC-HRMS reveals the impact of heat stress on
ST:STUDY_TITLE                   	pathogen-elicited immunity in maize
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Studies investigating crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stress have largely
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	focused on plant responses to singular forms of stress and individual
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	biochemical pathways that only partially represent stress responses. Thus,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	combined biotic and abiotic stress treatments and the global assessment of their
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	elicited metabolic expression remains largely unexplored. In this study, we
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	employed targeted and untargeted metabolomics to investigate the metabolic
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	responses of maize (Zea mays) to both individual and combinatorial stress
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	treatments using heat (abiotic) and Cochliobolus heterostrophus infection
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	(biotic) experiments. Ultra-high-performance liquid
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry revealed significant metabolic
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	responses to C. heterostrophus infection and heat stress, and comparative
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	analyses between these individual forms of stress demonstrated differential
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	elicitation between the two global metabolomes. In combinatorial experiments,
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	treatment with heat stress prior to fungal inoculation negatively impacted maize
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	disease resistance against C. heterostrophus, and distinct metabolome separation
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	between combinatorial stressed plants and the non-heat stressed infected
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	controls was observed. Targeted analysis revealed inducible primary and
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	secondary metabolite responses to biotic/abiotic stress, and combinatorial
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	experiments indicated that deficiency in the hydroxycinnamic acid, p-coumaric
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	acid, may lead to the heat-induced susceptibility of maize to C. heterostrophus.
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	Collectively, these findings demonstrate that abiotic stress can predispose
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	crops to more severe disease symptoms, underlining the increasing need to
ST:STUDY_SUMMARY                 	investigate defense chemistry in plants under combinatorial stress.
ST:INSTITUTE                     	Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture
ST:DEPARTMENT                    	Center of Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology
ST:LABORATORY                    	Chemistry Research Unit
ST:LAST_NAME                     	Christensen
ST:FIRST_NAME                    	Shawn
ST:ADDRESS                       	1600 SW 23rd Drive Gainesville, FL 32608
ST:EMAIL                         	shawn.christensen@usda.gov
ST:PHONE                         	3523745739
#SUBJECT
SU:SUBJECT_TYPE                  	Plant
SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES               	Zea mays
SU:TAXONOMY_ID                   	4577
#SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS:         	SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	1_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=01_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	2_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=02_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	3_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=03_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	4_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=04_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	5_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=05_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	6_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=06_SLB_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	7_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=07_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	8_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=08_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	9_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=09_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	10_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=10_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	11_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=11_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	12_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 28°C under watered conditions; RAW_FILE_NAME=12_Tween_28_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	25_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=25_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	26_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=26_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	27_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=27_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	28_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=28_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	29_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=29_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	30_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=30_SLB_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	31_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=31_Tween_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	32_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=32_Tween_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	33_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=33_Tween_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	34_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 28°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=34_Tween_38_3d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	49_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=49_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	50_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=50_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	51_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=51_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	52_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=52_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	53_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=53_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	54_	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=3d post SLB (C. heterostrophus) inoculation on 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions, then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=54_SLB_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	55_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=55_Tween_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	56_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=56_Tween_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	57_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=57_Tween_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	58_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=58_Tween_38_6d_H2O
SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS           	-	59_	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Description=Tween 20 control treated 3rd leaf, 14d old plant grown at 38°C under watered conditions,  then returned to 38°C; RAW_FILE_NAME=59_Tween_38_6d_H2O
#COLLECTION
CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY            	Samples were collected and flash frozen in liquid N2
CO:SAMPLE_TYPE                   	Plant
#TREATMENT
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	For inoculations, single isolates of Cochliobolus heterostrophus were cultured
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	on V8 agar for 3-4 weeks as described by (Christensen et al., 2018). Spot
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	inoculations were performed on 14-d-old plants in which four 10 μl droplets of
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	either C. heterostrophus suspension (1x106 spores mL-1) or control solution
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	(sterile 0.1% Tween 20) were applied in a staggered fashion (Fig. 2a and Fig.
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	4a) onto the middle portion of the third leaf about 10cm from the distal tip.
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	Following inoculation, both heat-stressed and non-heat-stressed plants were
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	placed in a plastic humidity chamber and placed in the 28°C Percival. At 24
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	hours post-inoculation, infected and non-infected controls were removed from the
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	humidity chambers and maintained at 28°C for the remainder of the experiment.
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	At 72 hours post-inoculation, leaves (n=6) were photographed and immediately
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	harvested into liquid N2. Lesions were digitally measured using ImageJ software
TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY             	(ImageJ 1.36b; Wayne Rasband, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
#SAMPLEPREP
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	LCMS grade reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used throughout the
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	extraction. Frozen 1.5-mL fast prep tubes with Zirmil® beads (1.1mm; SEPR
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Ceramic Beads and Powders, Mountainside, NJ, USA) containing 50 mg of ground and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	frozen tissue were carefully thawed to 4°C then transferred to ice. An internal
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	standard mix of 12 μL containing caffeine, D6-Abscisic acid, D5-Jasmonic acid,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	D5-Cinnamic acid, D5-Indole-3-acetic acid, 13C-alpha linolenic acid, and
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	nicotine at 8.33 μg/mL was added to each sample along with 750 μL of 10 mM of
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	ammonium acetate and 750 μL of methanol (MeOH). Samples were mixed by vortex
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	then homogenized at 6000 RPM for 30 seconds in a FastPrep® FP 120 tissue
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	homogenizer (Qbiogene) and then sonicated in an ambient water bath for 15 min.
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 20,000 RCF at ambient temperature,
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	then 1 mL of supernatant was transferred to individual 4 mL glass vials. The
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	supernatant was dried under a nitrogen stream at 30°C, reconstituted in 200 μL
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	of 0.1% formic acid in water, and vortexed for 30 seconds. Vial contents were
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	transferred to a 1.5-mL snap-cap tube, placed on ice for 10 minutes, then
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	centrifuged at 20,000 RCF for 10 minutes at ambient temperature. 150 μL of
SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY            	supernatant was transferred to glass LC vials for UHPLC-HRMS analysis.
#CHROMATOGRAPHY
CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE           	Reversed phase
CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Vanquish
CH:COLUMN_NAME                   	ACE Excel 2 C18-PFP (100 x 2.1mm, 2um)
#ANALYSIS
AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE                 	MS
#MS
MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME               	Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE               	Orbitrap
MS:MS_TYPE                       	ESI
MS:ION_MODE                      	NEGATIVE
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	The raw acquisition data were processed using a similar workflow described in
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	previous work (Chamberlain et al., 2019a, b), which we detail here. Raw data
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	files were converted from .raw to .mzxml format using RawConverter (He et al.,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	2015). MZmine 2 was used for processing the raw data including detecting masses,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	building chromatograms, grouping isotopic peaks, removing duplicate peaks, and
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	aligning features (Pluskal et al., 2010). Identification was assigned to
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	features by m/z (≤5 ppm) and retention time (0.2 min) (level 1 –
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	identified compounds according to Metabolomics Standards Initiative standards
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	(Sumner et al., 2007)) matching tousing our method-specific metabolite library
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	produced from pure standards previously analyzed using this the above-mentioned
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	chromatographic gradient. Processed data were exported from MZmine as a feature
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	list containing the signal intensity for each feature in each sample. A small
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	value (half the minimum value in the dataset) was used to replace zeros (no
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	detection). The data were filtered to remove sample features with  10% signal
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	contribution from their corresponding features in the extraction blanks. From
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	this point, the data were further processed, normalized, and filtered using
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (Chong et al., 2018). For whole-metabolome comparative
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	analyses, the data were normalized to total ion signal and feature intensities
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	were auto-scaled to facilitate statistical comparisons (van den Berg et al.,
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	2006). Statistical significance, defined as p  0.05, was determined using the
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	two-tailed student’s t-test, and values for significance were adjusted for the
MS:MS_COMMENTS                   	false discovery rate with the Bonferroni-Holm method (HOLM, 1979).
#MS_METABOLITE_DATA
MS_METABOLITE_DATA:UNITS	peak intensity
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_START
Samples	1_	2_	3_	4_	5_	6_	7_	8_	9_	10_	11_	12_	25_	26_	27_	28_	29_	30_	31_	32_	33_	34_	49_	50_	51_	52_	53_	54_	55_	56_	57_	58_	59_
Factors	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 28	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:SLB inoculation | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38	Sample Type:Control | Age:14 day | Growth Temperature:38 returned to 38
Catechol	176603.832	270123.4046	471865.2675	362157.0999	704936.667	395007.815	125094.9699	969175.9919	632927.4595	224647.1865	174560.5441	734276.3736	662433.4218	374088.8393	289154.8436	96907.79457	439849.7913	315687.8122	519948.5096	462429.0279	464860.2949	246120.3329	1437008.298	355346.6	545137.0003	1649.30528	179964.9176	99605.70964	151756.5625	459808.5568	109442.9097	596311.4603	113758.7951
Citric acid	518567107.3	496978734	1458279794	687724620.7	375680201.3	881591848.2	849659070.2	1063513055	1558383463	891833925.9	918070700	1305206496	313373112.6	512882310.1	1368930365	1027908639	519569498.1	877271401.7	1327821126	803145969.3	787500375.7	641239579.8	365132807.3	970084301.8	981341976.1	185873.9379	1903978827	1168260185	1706593537	840781639.7	598763210.6	227124175.4	654595975.7
Cryptochlorogenic acid	135826.5719	43277.15678	484296.3257	25467.11166	2611024.035	605650.3397	4575462.944	4179984.231	2702415.01	759617.2724	71235.64353	692179.1344	698896.1792	41898.06966	5097544.328	594305.5439	271890.2975	42304593.16	205919711	21936.25973	660355.5196	116029.1421	2228832.912	637001.2114	99574.89227	497.4088837	17994227.71	8041482.477	19623040.47	817333.6618	3791428.736	137325.1025	855522.5247
Mevalonic acid	606083.3017	757993.2822	2726708.659	938582.5096	966438.8224	2843702.08	2071516.349	2689738.755	3762972.941	1473680.727	1446876.533	2350952.632	1113202.622	1037348.406	2869223.256	2171554.161	1682130.257	1657342.551	5454204.333	1684655.702	2594017.998	2338767.111	1772007.701	1812789.47	1925029.209	8434.744316	4881163.247	2280997.512	3233592.093	2259811.919	1799492.245	1027053.375	1782278.669
Ribose-5-Phosphate	12723521.15	12711436.93	7242452.69	14666897.45	12034303.4	10421408.81	3482266.522	3618743.763	3632940.636	8578909.733	17270846.97	13778661.84	10473073.46	9382992.076	1352116.904	75265.43262	7321980.655	10074911.87	8044334.157	9906414.809	3761975.043	7719477.295	9611054.812	2217118.746	9811750.772	45908.14858	2053123.076	1469413.707	3175671.551	2353099.364	5774654.156	7682311.121	5065569.715
Salicylic acid	3068548.58	3190018.081	10761842.55	4831981.198	5829247.311	5897326.952	21517472.31	17795377.73	23824189.86	6494262.011	3542471.522	6099924.055	4261939.068	3398469.45	12249572.49	9316116.458	5179139.869	8894124.007	10847201.34	8157476.539	18512609.86	4819824.644	6597557.857	6585791.314	8669883.126	1128539.627	10917402.97	10126942.22	14958214.33	19291141.21	15715719.03	3807904.563	21258797.22
Shikimic acid	40899262.23	33448553.97	88290894.79	62638183.55	49852056.11	63853240.42	20511643.57	57536456.4	44667334.86	42269483.82	43131025.7	94866752.69	61703089.78	38246019.99	34239395.64	28780584.61	47332775.52	37978457.02	168768231.4	19278475.72	19411273.51	32944117.66	107410927.9	29169587.74	41661059.88	2313.130649	88734209.91	36808556.79	53440049.67	31441027.74	10916545.76	54473700.6	27557196.13
Valine	4295135.365	4154951.486	16225362.06	3964097.69	17710362.31	7033356.783	7349628.305	11286474.96	11503563.82	5207066.223	4230253.972	16458810.99	4633852.416	3439378.586	15096260.11	9133744.644	1717772.011	7571303.538	41009809.83	3301924.896	7553606.038	3321536.417	16428341.97	11304827.75	13864643.42	497.4088837	13992302.18	11134399.14	15577218.8	7339735.106	6866768.108	6470095.87	7536229.597
ZealexinA4	519802.7399	517495.4505	666611.7469	637203.4388	226360.1108	806126.695	166981.8129	331176.9912	324834.4659	499976.4144	589318.5147	523103.0448	403863.6177	364922.7875	235017.7881	219834.6106	396311.9706	351692.2062	205874.6803	772487.8828	100437.1942	652649.4609	228956.6508	297741.4903	229410.3167	497.4088837	517998.3117	262371.6478	454853.9149	127519.0998	339165.8511	206080.9945	78481.90429
MS_METABOLITE_DATA_END
#METABOLITES
METABOLITES_START
metabolite_name	quantitated m/z [M-H]-	PubChem
Catechol	109.0289	289
Citric acid	191.01918	311
Cryptochlorogenic acid	353.0872	9798666  
Mevalonic acid	147.0657	439230  
Ribose-5-Phosphate	229.0113	77982  
Salicylic acid	137.0239	338  
Shikimic acid	173.045524	8742
Valine	116.0711	6287  
ZealexinA4	247.1334	135398014
METABOLITES_END
#END