#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH deshpa11_20240307_131037 DATATRACK_ID:4692 STUDY_ID:ST003119 ANALYSIS_ID:AN005113 VERSION 1 CREATED_ON 04-01-2024 #PROJECT PR:PROJECT_TITLE Bleach protects algal crops from novel pathogen but increases stress tolerance PR:PROJECT_TITLE traits and virulence factors within the associated bacterial microbiome PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY Analysis of exometabolites in algal ponds cultivated with or without bleach PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY treatment for pest management. The goal of this work is to uncover metabolic PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY features that drive differences in bleach treated and unbleached algal PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY cultivation ponds. Six ponds were used for the experiment, with three ponds PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY managed for pests via sodium hypochlorite (ponds C2, C3, and C4), and three PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY ponds unmanaged (A3, B2, and B4) and samples were taken at 7 different PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY timepoints (1-7) from early growth phase at day 1 to day 16. PR:INSTITUTE National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) PR:DEPARTMENT Bioscience PR:LABORATORY Algae Lab PR:LAST_NAME Deshpande PR:FIRST_NAME Arnav PR:ADDRESS 15013 Denver West Parkway PR:EMAIL arnav.deshpande@nrel.gov PR:PHONE 7657759029 PR:DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8BM7V #STUDY ST:STUDY_TITLE Bleach protects algal crops from novel pathogen but increases stress tolerance ST:STUDY_TITLE traits and virulence factors within the associated bacterial microbiome ST:STUDY_SUMMARY Microalgae farming is a promising and growing industry. Most large-scale ST:STUDY_SUMMARY cultivation is done in open pond or raceway systems, as other approaches (e.g., ST:STUDY_SUMMARY photobioreactors) have high upfront capital costs. Open pond cultivation systems ST:STUDY_SUMMARY leave cultures vulnerable to contamination by pests including rotifers, ST:STUDY_SUMMARY ciliates, and flagellates that feed on microalgae. Pest organisms can either ST:STUDY_SUMMARY decrease algal productivity or lead to wholesale crop loss (i.e., a pond crash) ST:STUDY_SUMMARY which can significantly lower annual production rates and increase annual costs. ST:STUDY_SUMMARY Sodium hypochlorite is the active ingredient in bleach, an effective and ST:STUDY_SUMMARY inexpensive chlorine-based disinfectant commonly used at scale to protect algal ST:STUDY_SUMMARY crops. In this study, we investigate 1) if and how bleach treatment changes ST:STUDY_SUMMARY bacterial community composition, 2) if changes to bacterial composition result ST:STUDY_SUMMARY in changes in the functional potential of the bacterial community, 3) if an ST:STUDY_SUMMARY algal pathogen can be identified as the cause of pond crashes in untreated ST:STUDY_SUMMARY ponds, and finally, 4) explore the effect of bleach treatment on metabolic ST:STUDY_SUMMARY features present in bleached and unbleached ponds, 5) explore the effect of ST:STUDY_SUMMARY treatment on virulence factors associated with known human and animal pathogens. ST:INSTITUTE National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) ST:LAST_NAME Deshpande ST:FIRST_NAME Arnav ST:ADDRESS 15013 Denver West Parkway ST:EMAIL arnav.deshpande@nrel.gov ST:PHONE 7657759029 ST:SUBMIT_DATE 2024-03-07 #SUBJECT SU:SUBJECT_TYPE Water sample SU:SUBJECT_SPECIES Algae #SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS: SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Additional sample data SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_1 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_1.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_2 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_2.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_3 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_3.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_4 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_4.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_5 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_5.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_6 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_6.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_7 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_7.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_8 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_8.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_9 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_9.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_10 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_10.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_11 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_11.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_12 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_12.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_13 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_13.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_14 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_14.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_15 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_15.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_16 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_16.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_17 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_17.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_18 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_18.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_19 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond C2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_19.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_20 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond C3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_20.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_21 Treatment:Bleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond C4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_21.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_22 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_22.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_23 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_23.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_24 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:1 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_24.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_25 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_25.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_26 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_26.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_27 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:2 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_27.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_28 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_28.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_29 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_29.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_30 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:3 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_30.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_31 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_31.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_32 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_32.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_33 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:4 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_33.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_34 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_34.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_35 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_35.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_36 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:5 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_36.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_37 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_37.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_38 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_38.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_39 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:6 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_39.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_40 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond A3 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_40.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_41 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond B2 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_41.mzML SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS - S_42 Treatment:Unbleached | Timepoint:7 | Sample source:Pond B4 RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw file name)=S_42.mzML #COLLECTION CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY Samples were collected from all 6 ponds (bleached and unbleached) at 7 different CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY times during algal growth. The algae was separated by centrifugation at 3700 rpm CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY for 10 minutes. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22μm filter. CO:SAMPLE_TYPE Culture Media CO:COLLECTION_LOCATION New Mexico State University, Las Cruces CO:COLLECTION_FREQUENCY 7 times over a 16 day culture period CO:STORAGE_CONDITIONS -20℃ #TREATMENT TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY Six ponds were used for the experiment, with three ponds managed for pests via TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY sodium hypochlorite (ponds C2, C3, and C4), and three ponds unmanaged (A3, B2, TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY and B4). The experiment was started on 9/27/2022 when the optical density at a TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY wavelength of 750 nanometers (OD750) was measured at 0.5 for each pond and TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY lasted for 16 days, concluding on 10/13/2022. Bleach was added to ponds C2, C3, TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY and C4 on 09/30/22, 10/04/22, 10/07/22, and 10/11/22 at 15 ppm. #SAMPLEPREP SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY Algae separated by centrifugation at 3700 rpm for 10 mins followed by filtration SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY using a 0.22μm filter #CHROMATOGRAPHY CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME Thermo Vanquish CH:COLUMN_NAME Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm,1.7um) CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE 25°C CH:FLOW_GRADIENT 90% solvent B for 1 min followed by a linear gradient down to 75% solvent B for CH:FLOW_GRADIENT 23 min, a linear gradient down to 45% solvent B in 2 min, a linear gradient down CH:FLOW_GRADIENT to 25% B in 4 min, followed by a step to the starting composition of 90% B and CH:FLOW_GRADIENT hold for 6 min for column regeneration for a total run time of 36 min. CH:FLOW_RATE 0.2 mL/min CH:INTERNAL_STANDARD 1-13C Leucine CH:SAMPLE_INJECTION 20 µL CH:SOLVENT_A 97% 18.2 mΩ-cm water/3% acetonitrile; 20 mM ammonium acetate; 15 mM ammonium CH:SOLVENT_A hydroxide CH:SOLVENT_B 95% acetonitrile/5% 18.2 mΩ-cm water; 20 mM ammonium acetate; 15 mM ammonium CH:SOLVENT_B hydroxide CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE HILIC #ANALYSIS AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE MS #MS MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE Orbitrap MS:MS_TYPE ESI MS:MS_COMMENTS Mass spectrometer data was collected using a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive mass MS:MS_COMMENTS spectrometer in negative ion mode. The scan range was from 60 to 900 m/z with a MS:MS_COMMENTS resolution of 140,000. Data was collected only at the MS1 scan level. Untargeted MS:MS_COMMENTS metabolomics was performed using Compound Discoverer 3.2 (Thermo Fisher MS:MS_COMMENTS Scientific). Retention time tolerance was set to 0.15 min. The detect compounds MS:MS_COMMENTS node was used with 5 ppm mass tolerance, an S/N threshold of 6, 50000 minimum MS:MS_COMMENTS peak intensity. The maximum peak width was set to 0.5 min, with a minimum 5 MS:MS_COMMENTS scans per peak and a minimum of 2 isotopes detected. Only the compounds with MS:MS_COMMENTS [M-H]-1 were selected for detection. Compounds were grouped with retention time MS:MS_COMMENTS (RT) tolerance of 0.2 min. The Fill Gaps node was used with 5 ppm mass MS:MS_COMMENTS tolerance, missing value imputation was implemented with random forest settings MS:MS_COMMENTS with number of trees set to 100 and max iterations set to 10. Background MS:MS_COMMENTS features were removed with max sample/blank set to 5. The Predict Compositions MS:MS_COMMENTS node was set at 2 ppm mass tolerance with element counts C90 H190 N10 O18 P5 S5. MS:MS_COMMENTS A Compound Discoverer endogenous metabolites database with 4400 compounds was MS:MS_COMMENTS used to assign compound annotations with a mass tolerance of 5 ppm. Results MS:MS_COMMENTS obtained were further filtered by removing background from blank samples (75% MS:MS_COMMENTS ACN), removing features with no annotations from mass list, as well as manual MS:MS_COMMENTS curation. MS:ION_MODE NEGATIVE MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE ST003119_AN005113_Results.txt UNITS:Raw Area Count Has m/z:Yes Has RT:Yes RT units:Minutes #END