#METABOLOMICS WORKBENCH Synbio355_20250908_075807 DATATRACK_ID:6394 STUDY_ID:ST004319 ANALYSIS_ID:AN007197 PROJECT_ID:PR002733 VERSION 1 CREATED_ON October 29, 2025, 9:36 pm #PROJECT PR:PROJECT_TITLE Community structure and metabolite profiles of psychrophiles and thermophiles PR:PROJECT_TITLE isolated from raw cow’s milk in Xinjiang, China. PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY This project characterizes the bacterial communities and metabolomic signatures PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY associated with psychrophilic and thermophilic isolates from raw cow’s milk PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY collected across seven dairy farms in Xinjiang, China. We performed 16S rRNA PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY gene sequencing on milk and associated environmental samples and carried out PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY untargeted LC–MS metabolomics on isolates re-inoculated into sterilized milk PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY (positive and negative ion modes). The dataset supports microbial source PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY tracking, strain-specific metabolite profiling, and assessment of potential PR:PROJECT_SUMMARY risks to milk quality and safety. PR:INSTITUTE Xinjiang University PR:LAST_NAME Yue PR:FIRST_NAME Haitao PR:ADDRESS Yushugou Street, Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Province PR:EMAIL yuehaitao@tsinghua.org.cn PR:PHONE 13639932226 #STUDY ST:STUDY_TITLE Community structure and metabolite profiles of psychrophiles and thermophiles in ST:STUDY_TITLE bovine raw milk from arid inland areas ST:STUDY_SUMMARY This project characterizes the bacterial communities and metabolomic signatures ST:STUDY_SUMMARY associated with psychrophilic and thermophilic isolates from raw cow’s milk ST:STUDY_SUMMARY collected across seven dairy farms in Xinjiang, China. We performed 16S rRNA ST:STUDY_SUMMARY gene sequencing on milk and associated environmental samples and carried out ST:STUDY_SUMMARY untargeted LC–MS metabolomics on isolates re-inoculated into sterilized milk ST:STUDY_SUMMARY (positive and negative ion modes). The dataset supports microbial source ST:STUDY_SUMMARY tracking, strain-specific metabolite profiling, and assessment of potential ST:STUDY_SUMMARY risks to milk quality and safety. We generated 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data ST:STUDY_SUMMARY from 21 raw milk samples and associated environmental samples to profile ST:STUDY_SUMMARY microbial community composition and potential contamination sources. From these ST:STUDY_SUMMARY samples we isolated representative psychrophilic and thermophilic strains (7 + ST:STUDY_SUMMARY 7), re-inoculated them into sterilized milk, and performed untargeted LC–MS ST:STUDY_SUMMARY metabolomics in both positive and negative ion modes. The metabolomics data ST:STUDY_SUMMARY reveal strain-specific metabolic signatures and identify metabolites potentially ST:STUDY_SUMMARY relevant to milk spoilage and food safety. Data deposited include raw 16S reads, ST:STUDY_SUMMARY isolate metadata, and LC–MS raw data and processed metabolite tables. ST:INSTITUTE Xinjiang University ST:LAST_NAME Yue ST:FIRST_NAME Haitao ST:ADDRESS Yushugou Street, Shuimogou District, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Province ST:EMAIL yuehaitao@tsinghua.org.cn ST:PHONE 13639932226 #SUBJECT SU:SUBJECT_TYPE Food item #SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS: SUBJECT(optional)[tab]SAMPLE[tab]FACTORS(NAME:VALUE pairs separated by |)[tab]Raw file names and additional sample data SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS A40_pos A40_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=A40_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS A40_neg A40_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=A40_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS B61_pos B61_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=B61_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS B61_neg B61_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=B61_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS C5_pos C5_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=C5_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS C5_neg C5_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=C5_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS D73_pos D73_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=D73_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS D73_neg D73_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=D73_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS E63_pos E63_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=E63_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS E63_neg E63_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=E63_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS F22_pos F22_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=F22_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS F22_neg F22_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=F22_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS G5_pos G5_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=G5_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS G5_neg G5_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Psychrophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=G5_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS AR1_pos AR1_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=AR1_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS AR1_neg AR1_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=AR1_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS BR2_pos BR2_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=BR2_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS BR2_neg BR2_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=BR2_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS CR2_pos CR2_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=CR2_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS CR2_neg CR2_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=CR2_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS DR1_pos DR1_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=DR1_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS DR1_neg DR1_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=DR1_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS ER1_pos ER1_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=ER1_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS ER1_neg ER1_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=ER1_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS FR1_pos FR1_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=FR1_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS FR1_neg FR1_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=FR1_neg.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS GR1_pos GR1_pos Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=GR1_pos.raw SUBJECT_SAMPLE_FACTORS GR1_neg GR1_neg Sample source:Raw milk isolate | Bacteria type:Thermophile RAW_FILE_NAME(Raw_file_name)=GR1_neg.raw #COLLECTION CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY Bacterial isolation and culture methods: Raw milk samples (100 mL each) were CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY collected from seven livestock farms (A–G) in July 2021. For isolation, 1 mL CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY of each milk sample was serially diluted in sterile normal saline to 10^−7. CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY Each dilution (100 µL) was spread onto MPC agar plates (n = 3 per dilution). CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY Psychrophilic isolates were selected by incubation at 6.5 ± 0.5 °C for 10 CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY days, while thermophilic isolates were selected by incubation at 55 ± 1 °C for CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY 48 ± 2 h. Distinct colonies were picked randomly, purified twice on MPC medium, CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY and propagated in TSB medium at 150 rpm for characterization. Purified strains CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY used for downstream analyses were maintained in culture in the laboratory (see CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY Methods for details). For taxonomic identification, genomic DNA from purified CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY isolates was extracted using a bacterial DNA extraction kit and the 16S rRNA CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY gene was PCR-amplified (27F / 1492R) and Sanger-sequenced for BLAST-based CO:COLLECTION_SUMMARY identification. CO:SAMPLE_TYPE Milk CO:COLLECTION_METHOD Milk collection and storage prior to inoculation/treatment: Raw milk (100 mL per CO:COLLECTION_METHOD sample) was aseptically collected from individual animals at seven farms (A–G) CO:COLLECTION_METHOD in July 2021. Collected samples were frozen in the field, transported to the CO:COLLECTION_METHOD laboratory on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C until downstream processing (DNA CO:COLLECTION_METHOD extraction for 16S sequencing and metabolite extraction for LC–MS). Aliquots CO:COLLECTION_METHOD of stored raw milk were later thawed as needed for culture isolation and CO:COLLECTION_METHOD follow-up experiments. #TREATMENT TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY Fourteen bacterial isolates (7 psychrophiles and 7 thermophiles) were obtained TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY from raw cow’s milk collected in Xinjiang, China. Each isolate was TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY re-inoculated into sterilized milk at 2% (v/v) and cultured under appropriate TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY conditions (psychrophiles at 6.5 ± 0.5 °C for 10 days; thermophiles at 55 ± 1 TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY °C for 48 ± 2 h). After incubation, metabolites were extracted from the TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY culture supernatants and analyzed by untargeted LC–MS in both positive and TR:TREATMENT_SUMMARY negative ion modes. #SAMPLEPREP SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY Samples were thawed at 4 °C and vortexed for 1 min to ensure homogeneity. An SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY aliquot of each sample was mixed with 200 µL methanol and 200 µL methyl SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY tert-butyl ether, vortexed, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane and used for metabolite SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY detection. A pooled quality control (QC) sample was prepared by combining 10 µL SP:SAMPLEPREP_SUMMARY from each extract. #CHROMATOGRAPHY CH:CHROMATOGRAPHY_TYPE Reversed phase CH:INSTRUMENT_NAME Thermo Vanquish CH:COLUMN_NAME Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (150 x 2.1mm,1.8um) CH:SOLVENT_A 100% water; 5 mM ammonium formate CH:SOLVENT_B 100% acetonitrile CH:FLOW_GRADIENT 0~1min, 2% B;1~9min, 2%~50% B; 9~12min, 50%~98% B;12~13.5min, 98% B;13.5~14min, CH:FLOW_GRADIENT 98%~2% B;14~20min, 2% B CH:FLOW_RATE 0.3 mL/min CH:COLUMN_TEMPERATURE 40 ℃ CH:METHODS_FILENAME report_(2).pdf #ANALYSIS AN:ANALYSIS_TYPE MS AN:ANALYSIS_PROTOCOL_FILE report_(2).pdf #MS MS:INSTRUMENT_NAME Thermo Orbitrap Exploris 120 MS:INSTRUMENT_TYPE Orbitrap MS:MS_TYPE ESI MS:ION_MODE NEGATIVE MS:MS_COMMENTS Data were acquired in full scan mode (m/z 70–1050) with data-dependent MS/MS. MS:MS_COMMENTS Capillary temperature: 320 °C; Spray voltage: 3.5 kV; Sheath gas: 35 arb; MS:MS_COMMENTS Auxiliary gas: 10 arb. Both positive and negative ESI modes were used. Raw MS:MS_COMMENTS LC–MS data were processed using Thermo Compound Discoverer for peak detection, MS:MS_COMMENTS alignment, and normalization. Metabolite annotation was based on accurate mass, MS:MS_COMMENTS MS/MS fragmentation patterns, and database comparison (HMDB and KEGG). MS:MS_RESULTS_FILE ST004319_AN007197_Results.txt UNITS:peak intensity Has m/z:Yes Has RT:Yes RT units:Seconds #END