Return to study ST002414 main page

MB Sample ID: SA242030

Local Sample ID:CX_L-ON_Naïve_B3
Subject ID:SU002503
Subject Type:Other organism
Subject Species:Xenopus laevis
Taxonomy ID:8355

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU002503
Subject Type:Other organism
Subject Species:Xenopus laevis
Taxonomy ID:8355

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
CX_L-ON_Naïve_B3SA242030FL030332NaïveFactor

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002496
Collection Summary:Optic nerves were collected from frogs at 7, 12, 18 and 27 weeks post optic nerve crush and subjected to lipid profiling.
Sample Type:Eye tissue

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002515
Treatment Summary:Optic nerves from each of 10 post-metamorphic transgenic Tg(Islet2b:EGFP-RPL10a) Xenopus laevis frogs, 3.5 - 5.0 cm in length, were either left untreated (naïve) or underwent a monocular surgery (operated; Fig. 1). Operated individuals were anesthetized with 0.05% ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (Sigma, USA) and received either a sham surgery (sham) or a crush injury (crush) to the right optic nerve, and no treatment the left optic nerve (control; Fig. 1).

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002509
Sampleprep Summary:Lipids were extracted from the optic nerve tissue with a Bligh and Dyer method. The organic phase containing the lipids was removed after centrifugation and dried down with a vacuum centrifuge. The lipids were flushed with argon gas to prevent oxidation and stored at -80°C prior to analysis. Dried lipid samples were reconstitued in 49µl of isopropanol:acetonitrile 1:1 (v/v) and 1µl of EquiSPLASH™ LIPIDOMIX® Quantitative Internal Standard (330731) and sonicated for 15 minutes for total solubilization. Samples were split into two separate vials containing 25µl each, one for positive mode and one for negative mode. Reversed phase chromatographic separation was performed on Vanquish Horizon UHPLC system (Thermo) using an Accucore Vanuqish C18+ UHPLC Column. An injection volume of 5µl was used and the flow rate was 260 µl/min. Mobile phase A was 50% acetonitrile, 50% water, 5mM ammonium formate, and 0.1% formic acid. Mobile phase B was 88% isopropanol, 10% acetonitrile, 2% water, 5mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid.

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003935
Analysis type MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Vanquish
Column Thermo Accucore C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
MS Type ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Ion Mode UNSPECIFIED
Units µg/ml

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002914
Instrument Name:Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:Thermo Accucore C18 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
Column Temperature:55
Flow Gradient:The gradient began at 10% B for 1 min, then shifted to 30% B for 1.5min, 50% for 3.5min, 60% for 10min, 80% for 2 min, 95% for 2 min, then stayed at 100% B for 6 min before ramping down to 10% B for 2 min.
Flow Rate:260 ul/min
Solvent A:50% acetonitrile/50% water; 0.1% formic acid; 5mM ammonium formate
Solvent B:88% isopropanol/10% acetonitrile/2% water; 0.1% formic acid; 5mM ammonium formate
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS003673
Analysis ID:AN003935
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The raw scans were analysed and quantified with LipidSearch 5.0 and the statistical analysis was conducted through Metaboanalyst 5.0.
Ion Mode:UNSPECIFIED
  logo