Metabolomics Workbench : NIH Data Repository

MB Sample ID: SA306590

Local Sample ID:	M00179_20220322_Neg_1_MSA0059
Subject ID:	SU002941
Subject Type:	Bacteria
Subject Species:	Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Taxonomy ID:	8188
Subject Comments:	Fecal derived communities and isolates, supernatant was assayed

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:

Subject:

Subject ID:	SU002941
Subject Type:	Bacteria
Subject Species:	Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Taxonomy ID:	8188
Subject Comments:	Fecal derived communities and isolates, supernatant was assayed

Factors:

Local Sample ID	MB Sample ID	Factor Level ID	Level Value	Factor Name
M00179_20220322_Neg_1_MSA0059	SA306590	FL036885	bacterial community	Genotype
M00179_20220322_Neg_1_MSA0059	SA306590	FL036885	15-member community timepoint 22	Treatment

Collection:

Collection ID:	CO002934
Collection Summary:	Isolates were obtained via plating of in vitro communities –, derived from culturing fecal samples from humanized mice –, on agar plates made with various complex media and frozen as glycerol stocks, as previously described (Cell Host & Microbe (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.12.008, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.13.523996v1) Frozen stocks were streaked onto BHI-blood agar plates (5% defibrinated horse blood in 1.5% w/v agar). Resulting colonies were inoculated into 3 mL of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) (BD #2237500) or modified Gifu Anaerobic Medium (mGAM) (HyServe #05433) in test tubes. All culturing was performed at 37 °C without shaking in an anaerobic chamber (Coy). To minimize potential physiological changes from freeze-thaw cycles and changes in growth medium, cultures were diluted 1:200 every 48 h for 3 passages before growth or metabolomics measurements. After the first passage, subsequent passages were performed in 96-well polystyrene plates (Greiner Bio-One #655161) filled with 200 μL of growth medium.
Sample Type:	Bacterial cells

Treatment:

Treatment ID:	TR002950
Treatment Summary:	Many combinations of bacterial isolates were assayed. details can be found in the publicly available preprint here: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.30.494065v1.abstract

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:	SP002947
Sampleprep Summary:	Spent media were collected as described above and immediately stored at -80 °C. Samples were thawed only once, immediately before LC-MS/MS. Thawed samples were kept on ice, each sample was homogenized by pipetting prior to dispensing. Two 20-µL aliquots of supernatant were removed from each sample well and dispensed into two shallow 96-well polypropylene plates, maintained on ice. Additionally, 5 µL were removed from each sample and combined into a homogenous pool; this pool was dispensed in 20-µL aliquots and prepared in parallel with samples. These pooled samples were used for in-run quality control, injected at predefined intervals over the course of analysis to ensure consistent instrument performance over time. Samples were analyzed using two complementary chromatography methods: reversed phase (C18) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). HILIC data include in this study, C18 data can be found uploaded in a separate study. All samples were analyzed by positive and negative mode electrospray ionization (ESI+, ESI-). Sample analysis order was randomized to minimize potential bias in data acquisition. Procedural blanks were prepared by extracting 20 µL of water in place of bacterial supernatant. Procedural blanks were inserted throughout the run as additional quality control.

Sampleprep ID:

SP002947

Sampleprep Summary:

Spent media were collected as described above and immediately stored at -80 °C. Samples were thawed only once, immediately before LC-MS/MS. Thawed samples were kept on ice, each sample was homogenized by pipetting prior to dispensing. Two 20-µL aliquots of supernatant were removed from each sample well and dispensed into two shallow 96-well polypropylene plates, maintained on ice. Additionally, 5 µL were removed from each sample and combined into a homogenous pool; this pool was dispensed in 20-µL aliquots and prepared in parallel with samples. These pooled samples were used for in-run quality control, injected at predefined intervals over the course of analysis to ensure consistent instrument performance over time. Samples were analyzed using two complementary chromatography methods: reversed phase (C18) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). HILIC data include in this study, C18 data can be found uploaded in a separate study. All samples were analyzed by positive and negative mode electrospray ionization (ESI+, ESI-). Sample analysis order was randomized to minimize potential bias in data acquisition. Procedural blanks were prepared by extracting 20 µL of water in place of bacterial supernatant. Procedural blanks were inserted throughout the run as additional quality control.

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID	AN004625	AN004626
Analysis type	MS	MS
Chromatography type	HILIC	HILIC
Chromatography system	Thermo Vanquish	Thermo Vanquish
Column	Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um)	Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um)
MS Type	ESI	ESI
MS instrument type	Orbitrap	Orbitrap
MS instrument name	Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap	Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Ion Mode	POSITIVE	NEGATIVE
Units	counts, height	counts, height

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:	CH003481
Chromatography Summary:	Bacterial supernatant were analyzed via hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled to a Thermo Q-Exactive HF high resolution mass spectrometer. Each sample was analyzed in both positive and negative ionization modes (ESI+, ESI-) via subsequent injections. Full MS-ddMS2 data was collected, an inclusion list was used to prioritize MS2 selection of metabolites from our in-house ‘local’ library, when additional scan bandwidth was available MS2 was collected in a data-dependent manner. Mass range was 60-900 mz, resolution was 60k (MS1) and 15k (MS2), centroid data was collected, loop count was 4, isolation window was 1.5 Da. Metabolomics data was processed using MS-DIAL v4.60 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-020-0531-2) and queried against a combination of our in-house MS2 library (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03707-9) and MassBank of North America, the largest freely available spectral repository (https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21535). Annotations were scored using guidelines from the metabolomics standards initiative (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt0807-846b). Features were excluded from analysis if peak height was not at least 5-fold greater in one or more samples compared to the procedural blank average.
Instrument Name:	Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:	Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um)
Column Temperature:	45C
Flow Gradient:	Gradient elution was performed from 100% (B) at 0–2 min to 70% (B) at 7.7 min, 40% (B) at 9.5 min, 30% (B) at 10.25 min, 100% (B) at 12.75 min, isocratic until 16.75 min with a column flow of
Flow Rate:	0.4 mL/min.
Solvent A:	Water + 10mM ammonium formate + 0.125% formic acid
Solvent B:	95% acetonitrile + 10mM ammonium formate + 0.125% formic acid
Chromatography Type:	HILIC

MS:

MS ID:	MS004371
Analysis ID:	AN004625
Instrument Name:	Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:	Orbitrap
MS Type:	ESI
MS Comments:	Full MS-ddMS2 data was collected, an inclusion list was used to prioritize MS2 selection of metabolites from our in-house ‘local’ library, when additional scan bandwidth was available MS2 was collected in a data-dependent manner. Mass range was 60-900 mz, resolution was 60k (MS1) and 15k (MS2), centroid data was collected, loop count was 4, isolation window was 1.5 Da. Metabolomics data was processed using MS-DIAL v4.60. Features were excluded from analysis if peak height was not at least 5-fold greater in one or more samples compared to the procedural blank average.
Ion Mode:	POSITIVE

MS ID:	MS004372
Analysis ID:	AN004626
Instrument Name:	Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid Orbitrap
Instrument Type:	Orbitrap
MS Type:	ESI
MS Comments:	Full MS-ddMS2 data was collected, an inclusion list was used to prioritize MS2 selection of metabolites from our in-house ‘local’ library, when additional scan bandwidth was available MS2 was collected in a data-dependent manner. Mass range was 60-900 mz, resolution was 60k (MS1) and 15k (MS2), centroid data was collected, loop count was 4, isolation window was 1.5 Da. Metabolomics data was processed using MS-DIAL v4.60. Features were excluded from analysis if peak height was not at least 5-fold greater in one or more samples compared to the procedural blank average.
Ion Mode:	NEGATIVE