Return to study ST002880 main page

MB Sample ID: SA314742

Local Sample ID:Hypoxia_1_8_pos
Subject ID:SU002993
Subject Type:Plant
Subject Species:Lycopersicon esculentum

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU002993
Subject Type:Plant
Subject Species:Lycopersicon esculentum

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
Hypoxia_1_8_posSA314742FL037467hypoxiacondition

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002986
Collection Summary:Control or hypoxia-exposed tomato roots were collected, minced, and extracted. Subsequently, lipidome profile was determined by LC-HRMS/MS
Collection Protocol Filename:experimental procedure.pdf
Sample Type:Plant roots
Collection Frequency:48h after hypoxia applied
Storage Conditions:-20℃

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR003002
Treatment Summary:Solanum lycopersicum (L.) cv. Moneymaker was cultivated under greenhouse conditions (14 h light 18 °C / 10 h dark 22 °C). Tomato plants grew on quartz sand culture for four weeks with a nutrient solution containing 5 mM NO3- [18,19]. Tomato roots were waterlogged for 48 h to apply hypoxic conditions.
Treatment:watterlogging
Treatment Doseduration:48h
Plant Light Period:14h
Plant Temp:18°C

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002999
Sampleprep Summary:Lipids from tomato roots were extracted with a modified procedure adapted from Shiva and colleagues [20]. In brief, 0.1 g of grinded roots (cooled on liquid nitrogen) were added to a glass reaction tube filled with isopropanol supplemented with 0.01 % BHT. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 75 °C and cooled on ice afterward. To the cooled-down mixture, 0.5 volume of chloroform, 0.2 volume of water and 3 µL of EquiSPLASH Lipidomix were added. Lipids were extracted for 1 h on ice with occasional vortexing in between. Reaction tubes were centrifuged at 5000 x g to induce phase separation, and the organic phase was transferred to another glass reaction tube. To the remaining water phase, 1.33 volumes of a chloroform:methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) supplemented with 0.1 % BHT was added and incubated for 30 min on ice with occasional vortexing. Reaction tubes were again centrifuged at 5000 rpm, and the chloroform phase was transferred to the second glass vial. The chloroform:methanol extraction step was repeated with the remaining water phase 3 times. Afterward, 0.33 volumes of KCl (1 M) were added to the combined lipid extracts and vortexed. The upper water phase was removed, and 0.66 volumes of water were added and vortexed. The upper phase was again removed, and sodium sulfate was added to remove the remaining water. Finally, the lipid extract was dried under constant N2-flow with a TurboVap sample evaporator (Biotage, Sweden) and frozen at -80°C until MS analysis.
Processing Storage Conditions:On ice
Extract Storage:-80℃
Sample Resuspension:chloroform:methanol:isopropanol (1:2:4 v/v/v, supplemented with 5 mM ammonium formate)
Sample Derivatization:none
Sample Spiking:EquiSPLASH

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN004719 AN004720
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Vanquish Thermo Vanquish
Column Thermo Accucore C30 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um) Thermo Accucore C30 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units normalized relative abundance normalized relative abundance (a.u.)

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH003553
Instrument Name:Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:Thermo Accucore C30 (150 x 2.1mm,2.6um)
Column Temperature:50°C
Flow Gradient:30% - 99% B 30min
Flow Rate:350µl/min
Solvent A:60% acetonitrile/40% water;10 mM ammonium formate; 0.1 % formic acid
Solvent B:90% isopropanol/10% acetonitrile; 10 mM ammonium formate; 0.1 % formic acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS004465
Analysis ID:AN004719
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:MS raw files were analysed with the software LipidSearch (version 4.2.27, Thermo Fisher) using the following parameters: retention time interval 0.01 min, m-score threshold 5, precursor tolerance 5 ppm, product tolerance 8 ppm, ID quality filter A (fatty acid chain and class identified completely) and B (class and some fatty acid chains identified). The resulting text files were processed with an in-house KNIME workflow and filtered for ppm error, peak quality and area score. The area of identical lipids with different ion adducts was summed up. The resulting excel file was processed in R (v 4.0.2) with manual inspection of raw areas (Figure S1). Lipids in the blanks or blank extracts were excluded from the data, if not at least 5-fold lower in intensity in blank controls. Lipid areas were normalized to the respective lipids in the EquiSplash standard, and median normalization was applied (Figure S2). Lipids present in less than 20% of samples were excluded from subsequent analysis of lipid species. For principal component analyses (PCA), lipid species identified in at least 50% of samples were considered, and the three independent replicates were batch-adjusted using the ComBat algorithm. Lipids were annotated on the molecular species level in accordance with the proposed nomenclature by the LIPID MAPS consortium since no information on the sn-position of acyl/alkyl constituents was available
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  
MS ID:MS004466
Analysis ID:AN004720
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:MS raw files were analysed with the software LipidSearch (version 4.2.27, Thermo Fisher) using the following parameters: retention time interval 0.01 min, m-score threshold 5, precursor tolerance 5 ppm, product tolerance 8 ppm, ID quality filter A (fatty acid chain and class identified completely) and B (class and some fatty acid chains identified). The resulting text files were processed with an in-house KNIME workflow and filtered for ppm error, peak quality and area score. The area of identical lipids with different ion adducts was summed up. The resulting excel file was processed in R (v 4.0.2) with manual inspection of raw areas (Figure S1). Lipids in the blanks or blank extracts were excluded from the data, if not at least 5-fold lower in intensity in blank controls. Lipid areas were normalized to the respective lipids in the EquiSplash standard, and median normalization was applied (Figure S2). Lipids present in less than 20% of samples were excluded from subsequent analysis of lipid species. For principal component analyses (PCA), lipid species identified in at least 50% of samples were considered, and the three independent replicates were batch-adjusted using the ComBat algorithm. Lipids were annotated on the molecular species level in accordance with the proposed nomenclature by the LIPID MAPS consortium since no information on the sn-position of acyl/alkyl constituents was available
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  logo