Return to study ST002555 main page
MB Sample ID: SA256853
| Local Sample ID: | OUHSCPD-8 |
| Subject ID: | SU002656 |
| Subject Type: | Cultured cells |
| Subject Species: | Homo sapiens |
| Taxonomy ID: | 9606 |
| Gender: | Female |
| Cell Biosource Or Supplier: | SNU3297 and SNU3298, and patient-derived ovarian cancer cells, A#5, A#8, A#39 were from Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. Patient-derived ovarian cancer cells, ASC110515, ASC102315, ASC061616, ASC060915, ASC062915B and ASC011215 were from Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. |
| Cell Passage Number: | 3 to 5 |
| Cell Counts: | 20 million cells |
Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:
Combined analysis:
| Analysis ID | AN004207 | AN004208 | AN004209 | AN004210 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis type | MS | MS | MS | MS |
| Chromatography type | Reversed phase | Reversed phase | Reversed phase | HILIC |
| Chromatography system | Waters Acquity | Waters Acquity | Waters Acquity | Waters Acquity |
| Column | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) | Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um) |
| MS Type | ESI | ESI | ESI | ESI |
| MS instrument type | Orbitrap | Orbitrap | Orbitrap | Orbitrap |
| MS instrument name | Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap | Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap | Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap | Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap |
| Ion Mode | POSITIVE | POSITIVE | NEGATIVE | NEGATIVE |
| Units | Fold change over standard | Fold change over standard | Fold change over standard | Fold change over standard |
Chromatography:
| Chromatography ID: | CH003118 |
| Chromatography Summary: | Low pH polar (Metabolon). All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below. |
| Instrument Name: | Waters Acquity |
| Column Name: | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) |
| Column Temperature: | 50 |
| Flow Gradient: | Linear gradient from 5% B to 80% B over 3.35 minutes. |
| Flow Rate: | 0.35 mL/min |
| Solvent A: | 0.1% formic acid and 0.05% PFPA in water, pH ~2.5 |
| Solvent B: | 0.1% formic acid and 0.05% PFPA in methanol, pH ~2.5 |
| Chromatography Type: | Reversed phase |
| Chromatography ID: | CH003119 |
| Chromatography Summary: | Low pH Lipophilic (Metabolon). All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below. |
| Instrument Name: | Waters Acquity |
| Column Name: | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) |
| Column Temperature: | 50 |
| Flow Gradient: | Linear gradient from 5% B to 80% B over 3.35 minutes. |
| Flow Rate: | 0.35 mL/min |
| Solvent A: | 0.1% formic acid and 0.05% PFPA in water, pH ~2.5 |
| Solvent B: | 0.1% formic acid and 0.05% PFPA in 50% methanol/50% acetonitrile, pH ~2.5 |
| Chromatography Type: | Reversed phase |
| Chromatography ID: | CH003120 |
| Chromatography Summary: | High pH (Metabolon). All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below. |
| Instrument Name: | Waters Acquity |
| Column Name: | Waters Acquity BEH C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.7um) |
| Column Temperature: | 40 |
| Flow Gradient: | Linear gradient from 0.5 to 70% B over 4.0 minutes, then rapid gradient to 99%B in 0.5 minutes. |
| Flow Rate: | 0.35 mL/min |
| Solvent A: | 6.5 mM ammonium bicarbonate in water, pH 8 |
| Solvent B: | 6.5 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 95% methanol/5% water |
| Chromatography Type: | Reversed phase |
| Chromatography ID: | CH003121 |
| Chromatography Summary: | HILIC (Metabolon). All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below. |
| Instrument Name: | Waters Acquity |
| Column Name: | Waters Acquity BEH Amide (150 x 2.1mm, 1.7um) |
| Column Temperature: | 40 |
| Flow Gradient: | Linear gradient from 5% B to 50% B in 3.5 minutes, then linear gradient from 50% B to 95% B in 2 minutes. |
| Flow Rate: | 0.50 mL/min |
| Solvent A: | 10 mM ammonium formate in 15% water/5% methanol/ 80% acetonitrile (effective pH 10.16 with NH4OH) |
| Solvent B: | 10 mM ammonium formate in 50% water/50% acetonitrile (effective pH 10.60 with NH4OH) |
| Chromatography Type: | HILIC |
