Metabolomics Workbench : NIH Data Repository

MB Sample ID: SA306778

Local Sample ID:	M00179_20220322_Pos_2_MSA0002
Subject ID:	SU002941
Subject Type:	Bacteria
Subject Species:	Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Taxonomy ID:	8188
Subject Comments:	Fecal derived communities and isolates, supernatant was assayed

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:	SP002947
Sampleprep Summary:	Spent media were collected as described above and immediately stored at -80 °C. Samples were thawed only once, immediately before LC-MS/MS. Thawed samples were kept on ice, each sample was homogenized by pipetting prior to dispensing. Two 20-µL aliquots of supernatant were removed from each sample well and dispensed into two shallow 96-well polypropylene plates, maintained on ice. Additionally, 5 µL were removed from each sample and combined into a homogenous pool; this pool was dispensed in 20-µL aliquots and prepared in parallel with samples. These pooled samples were used for in-run quality control, injected at predefined intervals over the course of analysis to ensure consistent instrument performance over time. Samples were analyzed using two complementary chromatography methods: reversed phase (C18) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). HILIC data include in this study, C18 data can be found uploaded in a separate study. All samples were analyzed by positive and negative mode electrospray ionization (ESI+, ESI-). Sample analysis order was randomized to minimize potential bias in data acquisition. Procedural blanks were prepared by extracting 20 µL of water in place of bacterial supernatant. Procedural blanks were inserted throughout the run as additional quality control.

Sampleprep ID:

SP002947

Sampleprep Summary:

Spent media were collected as described above and immediately stored at -80 °C. Samples were thawed only once, immediately before LC-MS/MS. Thawed samples were kept on ice, each sample was homogenized by pipetting prior to dispensing. Two 20-µL aliquots of supernatant were removed from each sample well and dispensed into two shallow 96-well polypropylene plates, maintained on ice. Additionally, 5 µL were removed from each sample and combined into a homogenous pool; this pool was dispensed in 20-µL aliquots and prepared in parallel with samples. These pooled samples were used for in-run quality control, injected at predefined intervals over the course of analysis to ensure consistent instrument performance over time. Samples were analyzed using two complementary chromatography methods: reversed phase (C18) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). HILIC data include in this study, C18 data can be found uploaded in a separate study. All samples were analyzed by positive and negative mode electrospray ionization (ESI+, ESI-). Sample analysis order was randomized to minimize potential bias in data acquisition. Procedural blanks were prepared by extracting 20 µL of water in place of bacterial supernatant. Procedural blanks were inserted throughout the run as additional quality control.