Summary of Study ST002456

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001584. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8Z71C This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Show all samples  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST002456
Study Title1H NMR metabolomics applied to assess the metabolic response of Ruditapes philippinarum clams to sea warming and 17-α-ethinylestradiol exposure
Study Type1H NMR metabolomics to study the effects of warming conditions and exposure to 17-α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) on the polar metabolome of Ruditapes philippinarum clams
Study SummaryIn this study, a comprehensive untargeted 1H NMR metabolomics strategy was applied to measure the metabolic impact of sea warming, in tandem with exposure to EE2, on Ruditapes philippinarum clams. The clams were exposed to five different EE2 concentrations: 0 (control group), 5, 25, 125 and 625 ng/L; either at 17 °C as control temperature or at 21 °C (representing a 4 °C increase, which corresponds to the worst-case warming scenario). The obtained data added important knowledge, unveiling individual metabolic effects of temperature rise and synergetic effects upon EE2 exposure, and paving the way for the definition of new metabolic markers for the monitoring of environmental stressors.
Institute
University of Aveiro
DepartmentCICECO – Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry
LaboratoryMetabolomics Group- CICECO
Last NameRodrigues
First NameJoao A.
AddressUniversity of Aveiro, Campus Universitario de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Emailjoao.e.a.rodrigues@gmail.com
Phone00351963481841
Submit Date2023-01-26
Num Groups10
Total Subjects103
Study CommentsThis work was developed within the CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials project (UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020 & LA/P/0006/2020) financed by national funds through the FCT/MEC (PIDDAC). We are also grateful to the Portuguese National NMR Network (PTNMR), supported by FCT funds as the NMR spectrometer used is part of PTNMR and partially supported by Infrastructure Project No. 022161 (co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE 2020, POCI and PORL, and the FCT through PIDDAC). This work was also financially supported by the project BISPECIAl: BIvalveS under Polluted Environment and ClImate chAnge (POCI-01-0145-FEDER- 028425) funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES. Mónica G. Silva benefited from Research Grant (MSc) (BI/CESAM/0043_2019/POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028425) under the project BISPECIAl: BIvalveS under Polluted Environment and ClImate change PTDC/CTA-AMB/28425/2017 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028425).
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)fid
Analysis Type DetailNMR
Release Date2023-10-02
Release Version1
Joao A. Rodrigues Joao A. Rodrigues
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8Z71C
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002557
Treatment Summary:Sea warming and 17-α-ethinylestradiol exposure. After depuration, the organisms were subjected to a chronic toxicity test for 28 days, consisting of exposure to five different EE2 concentrations: 0 (control group), 5, 25, 125 and 625 ng/L. To assess the effects of a warming scenario on the impacts of EE2, the experiments were carried out at 17 ± 1 °C (control; mean temperature of sampling area during September) and at 21 ± 1 °C (worst-case climate change scenario). The aquaria were placed in distinct climatic rooms for each temperature. To reach 21 °C, the temperature was raised by 2 °C, every 2–3 days. For each concentration level and temperature, 12 samples were considered: 4 individuals per aquarium and 3 aquaria per treatment. In each aquarium, a total of 3 L of artificial seawater (salinity: 30 ± 1), continuous aeration, and a natural photoperiod were used. The exposure medium for each condition was renewed weekly, after which EE2 concentration levels were re-established. Mortality was checked daily and found to be null. At the end of the 28-day exposure period, the clams were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at – 80 ºC.
Treatment Protocol Filename:Bivalves_Experimental_Procedure.docx
Treatment Compound:Sea warming and 17-α-ethinylestradiol exposure
Treatment Dose:Clams were exposed to five different EE2 concentrations: 0 (control group), 5, 25, 125 and 625 ng/L. To assess the effects of a warming scenario on the impacts of EE2, the experiments were carried out at 17 ± 1 °C (control) and at 21 ± 1 °C (worst-case climate change scenario).
  logo