Return to study ST002090 main page

MB Sample ID: SA200578

Local Sample ID:MAYO-03792
Subject ID:SU002174
Subject Type:Mammal
Subject Species:Mus musculus
Taxonomy ID:10090
Gender:Female

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU002174
Subject Type:Mammal
Subject Species:Mus musculus
Taxonomy ID:10090
Gender:Female

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
MAYO-03792SA200578FL024352Mouse; GUS+ mono E. coli CecumSAMPLE_DESCRIPTION

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002167
Collection Summary:Mice fecal material was collected for analysis.
Sample Type:Feces

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002186
Treatment Summary:Mouse: Control mono E. coli Cecum Mouse: GUS+ mono E. coli Cecum Mouse: cecal post D Glucaro 1,4 lactone Female Mouse: cecal post D Glucaro 1,4 lactone Female Control

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002180
Sampleprep Summary:Fecal material was processed by metabolon as per their protocols

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003414
Analysis type MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase
Chromatography system Waters Acquity
Column Waters CSH C18 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
MS Type ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE
Units raw intensity

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002525
Chromatography Summary:Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS): All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below.
Instrument Name:Waters Acquity
Column Name:Waters CSH C18 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS003179
Analysis ID:AN003414
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS): All methods utilized a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 µm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from the same afore mentioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slighted between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  logo