Return to study ST001489 main page

MB Sample ID: SA125447

Local Sample ID:50_
Subject ID:SU001563
Subject Type:Plant
Subject Species:Zea mays
Taxonomy ID:4577

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN002466 AN002467
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Vanquish Thermo Vanquish
Column ACE Excel 2 C18-PFP (100 x 2.1mm, 2um) ACE Excel 2 C18-PFP (100 x 2.1mm, 2um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units peak intensity peak intensity

MS:

MS ID:MS002286
Analysis ID:AN002466
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The raw acquisition data were processed using a similar workflow described in previous work (Chamberlain et al., 2019a, b), which we detail here. Raw data files were converted from .raw to .mzxml format using RawConverter (He et al., 2015). MZmine 2 was used for processing the raw data including detecting masses, building chromatograms, grouping isotopic peaks, removing duplicate peaks, and aligning features (Pluskal et al., 2010). Identification was assigned to features by m/z (≤5 ppm) and retention time (0.2 min) (level 1 – identified compounds according to Metabolomics Standards Initiative standards (Sumner et al., 2007)) matching tousing our method-specific metabolite library produced from pure standards previously analyzed using this the above-mentioned chromatographic gradient. Processed data were exported from MZmine as a feature list containing the signal intensity for each feature in each sample. A small value (half the minimum value in the dataset) was used to replace zeros (no detection). The data were filtered to remove sample features with  10% signal contribution from their corresponding features in the extraction blanks. From this point, the data were further processed, normalized, and filtered using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (Chong et al., 2018). For whole-metabolome comparative analyses, the data were normalized to total ion signal and feature intensities were auto-scaled to facilitate statistical comparisons (van den Berg et al., 2006). Statistical significance, defined as p  0.05, was determined using the two-tailed student’s t-test, and values for significance were adjusted for the false discovery rate with the Bonferroni-Holm method (HOLM, 1979).
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  
MS ID:MS002287
Analysis ID:AN002467
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:The raw acquisition data were processed using a similar workflow described in previous work (Chamberlain et al., 2019a, b), which we detail here. Raw data files were converted from .raw to .mzxml format using RawConverter (He et al., 2015). MZmine 2 was used for processing the raw data including detecting masses, building chromatograms, grouping isotopic peaks, removing duplicate peaks, and aligning features (Pluskal et al., 2010). Identification was assigned to features by m/z (≤5 ppm) and retention time (0.2 min) (level 1 – identified compounds according to Metabolomics Standards Initiative standards (Sumner et al., 2007)) matching tousing our method-specific metabolite library produced from pure standards previously analyzed using this the above-mentioned chromatographic gradient. Processed data were exported from MZmine as a feature list containing the signal intensity for each feature in each sample. A small value (half the minimum value in the dataset) was used to replace zeros (no detection). The data were filtered to remove sample features with  10% signal contribution from their corresponding features in the extraction blanks. From this point, the data were further processed, normalized, and filtered using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (Chong et al., 2018). For whole-metabolome comparative analyses, the data were normalized to total ion signal and feature intensities were auto-scaled to facilitate statistical comparisons (van den Berg et al., 2006). Statistical significance, defined as p  0.05, was determined using the two-tailed student’s t-test, and values for significance were adjusted for the false discovery rate with the Bonferroni-Holm method (HOLM, 1979).
Ion Mode:NEGATIVE
  logo