Summary of Study ST001490

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR001007. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8J106 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST001490
Study TitlePlasma lipidomic profiles after a low and high glycemic load dietary pattern in a randomized controlled cross over feeding study
Study SummaryBackground: Dietary patterns low in glycemic load are associated with reduced risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Improvements in serum lipid concentrations may play a role in these observed associations. Objective: We investigated how dietary patterns differing in glycemic load affect a clinical lipid panel and plasma lipidomics profiles. Methods: In a crossover, controlled feeding study, 80 healthy participants (n=40 men, n=40 women), 18-45 y were randomized to receive low-glycemic load (LGL) or high glycemic load (HGL) diets for 28 days each with at least a 28-day washout period between controlled diets. Fasting plasma samples were collected at baseline and end of each diet period. A clinical lipid panel including total-, VLDL-, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were measured using an auto-analyzer. Lipidomics analysis using mass-spectrometry provided the concentrations of 863 species. Linear mixed models were used to test for a diet effect. Results: Lipids from the clinical panel were not significantly different between diets. Lipidomics analysis showed that 67 lipid species, predominantly in the triacylglycerol class, differed between diets (FDR<0.05). A majority of these were higher after the LGL diet compared to the HGL. Conclusion: While the clinical lipid measures did not differ between diets, some lipid species were higher after the LGL diet in the lipidomics analysis. The two diets were eucaloric and had similar percentage of energy from carbohydrate, protein and fat. Thus, the difference in macronutrient, particularly carbohydrate, quality of the LGL diet is likely affecting the composition of lipid species.
Institute
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Last NameDibay Moghadam
First NameSepideh
Address1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109
Emailsdibaymo@fredhutch.org
Phone206-667-4068
Submit Date2020-09-10
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)wiff
Analysis Type DetailFIA-MS
Release Date2020-09-24
Release Version1
Sepideh Dibay Moghadam Sepideh Dibay Moghadam
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8J106
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU001564
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606
Age Or Age Range:18-45
Gender:Male and female
Human Nutrition:Low glycemic load and high glycemic load diet
Human Inclusion Criteria:We recruited non-smoking, healthy individuals between the ages of 18-45 years from the Greater Seattle area.
Human Exclusion Criteria:Exclusion criteria consisted of impaired fasting glucose (fasting blood glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L), any physician-diagnosed condition requiring a restricted diet, food allergies, regular use of hormones or anti-inflammatory medication, current pregnancy or lactation or plans to become pregnant, or heavy use of alcohol (>2 drinks/d)
  logo