Return to study ST002398 main page

MB Sample ID: SA239047

Local Sample ID:Z22
Subject ID:SU002487
Subject Type:Fish
Subject Species:Danio rerio
Taxonomy ID:7955
Genotype Strain:wildtype and tango2bwh211
Age Or Age Range:4 weeks

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Subject:

Subject ID:SU002487
Subject Type:Fish
Subject Species:Danio rerio
Taxonomy ID:7955
Genotype Strain:wildtype and tango2bwh211
Age Or Age Range:4 weeks

Factors:

Local Sample IDMB Sample IDFactor Level IDLevel ValueFactor Name
Z22SA239047FL029790tango2 MutantGenotype
Z22SA239047FL02979026Weight (mg)

Collection:

Collection ID:CO002480
Collection Summary:Fish were bred and maintained using standard methods as described (Westerfield, 2000). All procedures were approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee. tango2bwh210 and tango2bwh211 zebrafish lines were created in our laboratory by CRISPR-Cas9 approach. Zebrafish embryonic (0-2 days post fertilization) and larval stages (3-45 dpf), juvenile stage (45 dpf-3months) and adults (3 months) have been defined as described previously (Kimmel, Ballard, Kimmel, Ullmann, & Schilling, 1995). All studies presented in this work were performed on tango2bwh211 mutants obtained from heterozygous parents unless specified. Myofibers were isolated from control or tango2 larval zebrafish (45 dpf) as described previously with minor modifications (Ganassi, Zammit, & Hughes, 2021). Skinned zebrafish muscle samples were treated with collagenase for 90 minutes and triturated to release the myofibers. Myofibers were centrifuged at 1000g for 60 sec, washed and resuspended in DMEM media. Myofibers were plated on laminin coated 8 chamber permanox slides (Thermofisher Scientific) for further analysis. Fixed cells were blocked in 10% goat serum/0.3% Triton, incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4ºC, washed in PBS, incubated in secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature (RT), washed in PBS, then mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Primary antibodies used were anti Tango2 (1:250, 27846-1-AP, Proteintech), mouse monoclonal anti sarcomeric -actinin (1:100, A7732, Millipore Sigma), mouse monoclonal anti Ryr1 (1:100, R129-100UL, Millipore Sigma), anti Tomm20 (1:100, MABT166, Millipore Sigma) and Alexa fluor 568-phalloidin (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A12380). After washing in PBS several times, samples were incubated with anti-mouse Alexa Fluor (1:100, A-11005) secondary antibody (Thermofisher Scientific). Imaging was performed using a Nikon Ti2 spinning disk confocal microscope.
Sample Type:Muscle
Collection Method:Muscle Dissection
Storage Conditions:Described in summary

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR002499
Treatment Summary:Fish were bred and maintained using standard methods as described (Westerfield, 2000). All procedures were approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee. tango2bwh210 and tango2bwh211 zebrafish lines were created in our laboratory by CRISPR-Cas9 approach. Zebrafish embryonic (0-2 days post fertilization) and larval stages (3-45 dpf), juvenile stage (45 dpf-3months) and adults (3 months) have been defined as described previously (Kimmel, Ballard, Kimmel, Ullmann, & Schilling, 1995). All studies presented in this work were performed on tango2bwh211 mutants obtained from heterozygous parents unless specified.

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP002493
Sampleprep Summary:Control and tango2 mutant myofibers (4 weeks, n=5 each) were homogenized with 1 ml of MBTE. 300 µL of methanol with internal standard was added and samples were mixed for 10 minutes. 200 µL of water was added to facilitate phase separation. The extracts were centrifuged at 20,000 rcf for 10 minutes. The top layer was removed, dried and reconstituted in 150 µl of IPA for analysis.
Processing Method:Liquid/Liquid Partition
Processing Storage Conditions:-80℃
Extraction Method:Liquid/Liquid Partition
Extract Cleanup:Centrifugation (20,000 rcf for 10 min)
Extract Storage:-80℃
Sample Resuspension:150 µL of IPA
Sample Derivatization:none
Sample Spiking:Spiked with 1.5 µg/mL of deuterated internal standards (Avanti EquiSplash mix)

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN003905
Analysis type MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase
Chromatography system Waters Acquity H-Class
Column Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
MS Type ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive HF-X Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE
Units peak area

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH002891
Chromatography Summary:Analysis was performed using a Thermo Q Exactive Plus coupled to a Waters Acquity H-Class LC. A 100 mm x 2.1 mm, 2.1 µm Waters BEH C18 column was used for separations. The following mobile phases were used: A- 60/40 ACN/H20 B- 90/10 IPA/ACN; both mobile phases contained 10 mM Ammonium Formate and 0.1% Formic Acid. A flow rate of 0.2 mL/minutes was used. Starting composition was 32% B, which increased to 40% B at 1 minute (held until 1.5 minutes) then 45% B at 4 minutes. This was increased to 50% B at 5 minutes, 60% B at 8 minutes, 70% B at 11 minutes, and 80% B at 14 minutes (held until 16 minutes). At 16 minutes the composition switched back to starting conditions (32% B) and was held for 4 minutes to re-equilibrate the column. Samples were analyzed in positive/negative switching ionization mode with top 5 data dependent fragmentation.
Instrument Name:Waters Acquity H-Class
Column Name:Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (100 x 2.1mm,1.7um)
Column Pressure:4220 psi
Column Temperature:45
Flow Gradient:Starting composition was 32% B, which increased to 40% B at 1 minute (held until 1.5 minutes) then 45% B at 4 minutes. This was increased to 50% B at 5 minutes, 60% B at 8 minutes, 70% B at 11 minutes, and 80% B at 14 minutes (held until 16 minutes). At 16 minutes the composition switched back to starting conditions (32% B) and was held for 4 minutes to re-equilibrate the column.
Flow Rate:0.2 mL/min
Injection Temperature:10
Internal Standard:Avanti EquiSplash mix
Sample Injection:5 µL
Solvent A:40% water/60% acetonitrile; 10 mM ammonium formate
Solvent B:90% isopropanol/10% acetonitrile; 10 mM ammonium formate
Capillary Voltage:3.50 KV
Running Voltage:3.50 KV
Weak Wash Solvent Name:90:10 Water:Acetontrile
Weak Wash Volume:300 µL
Strong Wash Solvent Name:1:1 Methanol:Isopropanol
Strong Wash Volume:50 µL
Sample Loop Size:10 µL
Sample Syringe Size:100 µL
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS003644
Analysis ID:AN003905
Instrument Name:Thermo Q Exactive HF-X Orbitrap
Instrument Type:Orbitrap
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:Analysis was performed using a Thermo Q Exactive Plus coupled to a Waters Acquity H-Class LC. A 100 mm x 2.1 mm, 2.1 µm Waters BEH C18 column was used for separations. The following mobile phases were used: A- 60/40 ACN/H20 B- 90/10 IPA/ACN; both mobile phases contained 10 mM Ammonium Formate and 0.1% Formic Acid. A flow rate of 0.2 mL/minutes was used. Starting composition was 32% B, which increased to 40% B at 1 minute (held until 1.5 minutes) then 45% B at 4 minutes. This was increased to 50% B at 5 minutes, 60% B at 8 minutes, 70% B at 11 minutes, and 80% B at 14 minutes (held until 16 minutes). At 16 minutes the composition switched back to starting conditions (32% B) and was held for 4 minutes to re-equilibrate the column. Samples were analyzed in positive/negative switching ionization mode with top 5 data dependent fragmentation. Raw data were analyzed by LipidSearch 4.2. Lipids were identified by MS2 fragmentation (mass error of precursor=5 ppm, mass error of product=8 ppm). The identifications were generated individually for each sample and then aligned by grouping the samples (OxPAPC=C, HF=S1, Con=S2). Normalization was performed using EquiSplash from Avanti. Samples were normalized and biological replicates were averaged. P-value and fold change were calculated as instructed as previously described (Aguilan, Kulej, & Sidoli, 2020). P-value was set to 0.05.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
Capillary Temperature:300
Capillary Voltage:3.50 KV
Collision Energy:25, 35, 45 V stepped collision energy
Fragmentation Method:HCD
Ion Source Temperature:400
Ion Spray Voltage:3.50 KV
Ionization:HESI
Mass Accuracy:5 ppm
Reagent Gas:Nitrogen
Source Temperature:400
Spray Voltage:3.5 KV
  logo